From 456b6d243d4ba0916a135ba7150520cbcd755bef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunil V L Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 18:39:20 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] non-normative/acpi.adoc: Fix the typo There is a typo which says RSDP must not be implemented to make it 64-bit clean. But it should be RSDT instead of RSDP. Signed-off-by: Sunil V L --- non-normative/acpi.adoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/non-normative/acpi.adoc b/non-normative/acpi.adoc index b716319..3f1ec16 100644 --- a/non-normative/acpi.adoc +++ b/non-normative/acpi.adoc @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ACPI started as a specification for 32-bit systems, so certain tables with physical address pointers (e.g. RSDP, FADT) allow for reporting either 32-bit or 64-bit values using different fields. For the sake of simplicity and consistency, the BRS disallows the use 32-bit address fields in such structures -and disallows the use of 32-bit only structures (thus, RSDP must not be implemented, +and disallows the use of 32-bit only structures (thus, RSDT must not be implemented, as the XSDT is a direct replacement). Thus, the ACPI tables are allowed to be located in any part of the physical address space.