Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

foo/bar: TestFormatter failed #2

Open
renatolabs opened this issue May 30, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

foo/bar: TestFormatter failed #2

renatolabs opened this issue May 30, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner

foo/bar.TestFormatter failed on release-19.2 @ deadbeef:

I'm a message
Help

Parameters: GOFLAGS=-race_test , ROACHTEST_cloud=test , ROACHTEST_cpu=2

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner Author

storage.TestReplicateQueueRebalance failed on release-0.1 @ abcd123:

	<autogenerated>:12: storage/replicate_queue_test.go:103, condition failed to evaluate within 45s: not balanced: [10 1 10 1 8]
Help

See also: How To Investigate a Go Test Failure (internal)
Parameters: GOFLAGS=race
, TEST=deadlock
, cloud=gce

Same failure on other branches

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner Author

foo/bar.TestFormatter failed on release-19.2 @ deadbeef:

I'm a message
Help

See also: How To Investigate a Go Test Failure (internal)
Parameters: GOFLAGS=-race_test
, ROACHTEST_cloud=test
, ROACHTEST_cpu=2

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner Author

foo/bar.TestFormatter failed on release-19.2 @ deadbeef:

I'm a message

Parameters: GOFLAGS=-somegoflags
, ROACHTEST_cloud=test
, ROACHTEST_cpu=2
, TAGS=-endtoendenv

Help

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner Author

foo/bar.TestFormatter failed on release-19.2 @ deadbeef:

I'm a message

Parameters: GOFLAGS=-somegoflags , ROACHTEST_cloud=test , ROACHTEST_cpu=2 , TAGS=-endtoendenv

Help

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner Author

foo/bar.TestFormatter failed on release-19.2 @ deadbeef:

I'm a message

Parameters: GOFLAGS=-somegoflags , ROACHTEST_cloud=test , ROACHTEST_cpu=2 , TAGS=-endtoendenv

Help

See also: How To Investigate a Go Test Failure (internal)

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner Author

foo/bar.TestFormatter failed on release-19.2 @ deadbeef:

I'm a message

Parameters: GOFLAGS=-somegoflags , ROACHTEST_cloud=test , ROACHTEST_cpu=2 , TAGS=-endtoendenv

Help

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

@renatolabs
Copy link
Owner Author

foo/bar.TestFormatter failed on release-19.2 @ deadbeef:

I'm a message

Parameters: GOFLAGS=-somegoflags , ROACHTEST_cloud=test , ROACHTEST_cpu=2 , TAGS=-endtoendenv

This test on roachdash | Improve this report!

renatolabs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2023
106502: batcheval: delete flaky integration test r=aliher1911 a=aliher1911

TestLeaseCommandLearnerReplica is fundamentally flaky as commit can't retry all underlying replication failures and acceptable failure causes are not exposed on the higher levels where test operates.

What test is supposed to verify that failures to propose with invalid lease are not causing pipelined writes to fail but are retried. More details described in original PR cockroachdb#35261 where this test is introduced.
In absence of direct controls of that, test is trying to move leases between replicas, but this action could cause different failures to happen which can't be filtered out. For example:
`failed to repropose 0b9a11f4bef0e3d3 at idx 16 with new lease index: [NotLeaseHolderError] ‹reproposal failed due to closed timestamp›`
and 
`stale proposal: command was proposed under lease #2 but is being applied under lease: ...`
While closed timestamp could be mitigated by changing settings, second one is opaque to the caller and hard to filter out.

Release note: None
Fixes cockroachdb#104716

Co-authored-by: Oleg Afanasyev <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant