You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am beta testing Fedora 41 and i have been monitoring how tuneD works.
Both balanced and performance work as expected, but powersave confuses me.
I had it as the active power mode (what is activated in Fedora Workstation 41's power GUI) and i noticed it draining a ton of battery, more than balanced.
I did more digging with cpupower_gui to see the active kernel cpufreq governor policy and i found out that powersave defaults to using the Ondemand governor.
Why are the technical reasons behind this governor choice? Wouldn't it make more sense to use the Powersave governor?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Raxelgrande
changed the title
Why does the powersave governor default to Ondemand and not Powersave?
Why does the powersave profile default to Ondemand instead of Powersave?
Oct 13, 2024
I am beta testing Fedora 41 and i have been monitoring how tuneD works.
Both balanced and performance work as expected, but powersave confuses me.
I had it as the active power mode (what is activated in Fedora Workstation 41's power GUI) and i noticed it draining a ton of battery, more than balanced.
I did more digging with cpupower_gui to see the active kernel cpufreq governor policy and i found out that powersave defaults to using the Ondemand governor.
Why are the technical reasons behind this governor choice? Wouldn't it make more sense to use the Powersave governor?
My CPU is a Ryzen 5 3500U, in the weird case this is a bug and the information is needed. My laptop uses the cpufreq driver.
Related kernel documentation: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/cpu-freq/governors.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: