Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RETRO/SPIKE: Rethink the PR testing process #14

Closed
heyselbi opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

RETRO/SPIKE: Rethink the PR testing process #14

heyselbi opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@Xaenalt @VedantMahabaleshwarkar

Comments

@heyselbi
Copy link

heyselbi commented Sep 18, 2023 •
edited by VedantMahabaleshwarkar
Loading

  • Can out PR review process be more streamlined and considerate of every engineer's bandwidth?
  • Can we make the automated test suites on each PR better/faster/more convenient?
  • Can we involve QE early in the process/would that be benefitial?
  • Can engineering/qe collaborate on developing testing and test suites?
@heyselbi heyselbi moved this from New/Backlog to To-do/Groomed in ODH Model Serving Planning Sep 18, 2023
@VedantMahabaleshwarkar VedantMahabaleshwarkar changed the title RETRO/SPIKE: Look into automating testing of PRs with QE RETRO/SPIKE: Rethink the PR testing process Oct 3, 2023
@VedantMahabaleshwarkar VedantMahabaleshwarkar moved this from To-do/Groomed to Under Review in ODH Model Serving Planning Nov 6, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Under Review to Done in ODH Model Serving Planning Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Xaenalt Xaenalt

@VedantMahabaleshwarkar VedantMahabaleshwarkar

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Xaenalt @VedantMahabaleshwarkar @heyselbi