Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync kustomization.yaml namespace with what we have in upstream #178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

jstourac
Copy link
Member

@jstourac jstourac commented Dec 5, 2024

The odh/rhoai operator overrides the namespace values anyway, so we should be okay. With this in sync with upstream, we reduce the code difference and will able the e2e tests to work as are defined now.

We may want to rethink the e2e test env preparation in the future eventually.

This is a followup to previous sync where @jiridanek was afraid to touch the namespace, so he did not sync this line then

The odh/rhoai operator overrides the namespace values anyway, so we
should be okay. With this in sync with upstream, we reduce the code
difference and will able the e2e tests to work as are defined now.

We may want to rethink the e2e test env preparation in the future
eventually.
@jstourac jstourac requested a review from jiridanek December 5, 2024 11:28
@jstourac jstourac self-assigned this Dec 5, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from atheo89 December 5, 2024 11:28
@jiridanek
Copy link
Member

looks like operator always overrides this value (both rhoai and odh) https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/blob/main/components/workbenches/workbenches.go#L176

yeah, should be safe; would like to see a rhoai-nightly, too bad the builds are now stopped; but even without it, yeah, let's go for it, I say

/lgtm

@jiridanek

This comment was marked as outdated.

@jiridanek
Copy link
Member

jiridanek commented Dec 5, 2024

The mood shall be imperative and never other.

/retitle Sync kustomization.yaml namespace with what we have in upstream

image

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title Synces kustomization.yaml namespace with what we have in upstream Sync kustomization.yaml namespace with what we have in upstream Dec 5, 2024
@jiridanek
Copy link
Member

/label tide/merge-method-squash

I am not a fan of useless merge commits when they are useless

@atheo89
Copy link
Member

atheo89 commented Dec 5, 2024

Thanks Jan for the fix!
/lgtm

@jstourac
Copy link
Member Author

jstourac commented Dec 5, 2024

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jstourac

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Dec 5, 2024
@jstourac jstourac merged commit 33b3f0a into red-hat-data-services:main Dec 5, 2024
7 checks passed
@jstourac jstourac deleted the sync-ds branch December 5, 2024 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants