Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non consistent whois responses #6

Open
umpirsky opened this issue Jun 2, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Non consistent whois responses #6

umpirsky opened this issue Jun 2, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@umpirsky
Copy link
Contributor

umpirsky commented Jun 2, 2013

I noticed that whois result varies for same domain from time to time, here is an example (umpirsky.com):

string(2426) "\nWhois Server Version 2.0\n\nDomain names can now be registered with many different competing registrars. \nGo to http://registrar.verisign-grs.com/whois/ for detailed information.\n\nNo match for "UMPIRSKY.COM".\n\n>>> Last update of whois database: 2013-06-02T09:51:14Z <<<\n\nNOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the \nregistrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is \ncurrently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the \nexpiration dat"...

string(2733) "\nWhois Server Version 2.0\n\nDomain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered\nwith many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net\nfor detailed information.\n\n Domain Name: UMPIRSKY.COM\n Registrar: ACTIVE 24 AS\n Whois Server: whois.active24.com\n Referral URL: http://www.active24.com\n Name Server: NS1.LOOPIA.SE\n Name Server: NS2.LOOPIA.SE\n Status: ok\n Updated Date: 01-apr-2013\n Creation Date: 02-apr-2008\n Expiration Date: 02-apr-2014\n\n>>> L"...

Related issue umpirsky/wisdom#16

It is easily reproducable for single or multiple domains with wisdom, as well as naked whois. I reproduced by runing https://github.com/umpirsky/wisdom/blob/master/examples/check.php several times in a row getting different results.

Note: wisdom is using "react/whois": "0.1.*".

@igorw
Copy link
Contributor

igorw commented Jun 2, 2013

It's actually a bug in react/dns. Currently it only checks for A records. It should be following the chain of CNAMEs as well.

@umpirsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

umpirsky commented Jun 2, 2013

@igorw Thanks. Should I open issue in react/dns repo?

@igorw
Copy link
Contributor

igorw commented Jun 3, 2013

I've submitted a patch, please test it.

@assertchris assertchris mentioned this issue Apr 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants