You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you Andre for this very useful tool. I have a question about the naming of the skipped exons in mutually exclusive events and I'd appreciate your help please. The documentation says exon 2 is "first skipped exon (first defined by genomic coordinates)" and exon 3 is "second skipped exon (second defined by genomic coordinates)". However, I see multiple mutually exclusive events where exon 3 comes before exon 2 in genomic coordinates (this happens in genes on either strand, see attached). I tried to find a unifying way for the naming and it seems exon 3 was always longer or same size as exon 2. This would be consistent with naming the other splicing events (isoform 2 is always the longer isoform).
I think it would be easier to interpret the splicing events if the skipped exons in mutually exclusive events were defined by genomic coordinates, so that isoforms 1 and 2 can be identified easily, as it is not immediately clear which exon is longer in a mutually exclusive event. I can switch the naming quickly but this affects PSI calculation too, correct?
Thank you Andre for this very useful tool. I have a question about the naming of the skipped exons in mutually exclusive events and I'd appreciate your help please. The documentation says exon 2 is "first skipped exon (first defined by genomic coordinates)" and exon 3 is "second skipped exon (second defined by genomic coordinates)". However, I see multiple mutually exclusive events where exon 3 comes before exon 2 in genomic coordinates (this happens in genes on either strand, see attached). I tried to find a unifying way for the naming and it seems exon 3 was always longer or same size as exon 2. This would be consistent with naming the other splicing events (isoform 2 is always the longer isoform).
I think it would be easier to interpret the splicing events if the skipped exons in mutually exclusive events were defined by genomic coordinates, so that isoforms 1 and 2 can be identified easily, as it is not immediately clear which exon is longer in a mutually exclusive event. I can switch the naming quickly but this affects PSI calculation too, correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: