-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
empty result when using cellsnp-lite #12
Comments
The command for cellsnp-lite lacks In addition, can you check whether your SRT samples are probe-based? As probe-based transcriptomics doesn't contain SNP information, we recommend running STARCH (https://github.com/raphael-group/STARCH/tree/develop) or other total copy number inference methods. |
Thank you. After adding candidate SNPs with the -R parameter, the results I obtained are still empty. My data is Visium FFPE, captured with probes. |
Hi, Probed-based spatial transcriptomics data does not provide the SNP information. We recommend using the total copy number inference methods such as STARCH (https://github.com/raphael-group/STARCH/tree/develop) and inferCNV (https://github.com/broadinstitute/infercnv). |
Thank you very much for your research in the field of CNA analysis. I have encountered some issues while using CalicoST. When I executed cellsnp-lite with three samples (10x Genomics Visium v2), the output files were all empty, and no SNPs were identified. Could you provide a download link for the bam files in the examples data? I need to confirm whether the issue is with my usage of CalicoST or the data itself. Best regards!
cellsnp-lite -s /disk/pipeline/STtools/CNV/calicost/MU_4174_F1-0829/possorted_genome_bam.bam -b /disk/pipeline/STtools/CNV/calicost/MU_4174_F1-0829/barcodes_change.txt -O /disk/pipeline/STtools/CNV/calicost/MU_4174_F1-0829/genotyping/ -p 20 --minMAF 0 --minCOUNT 1 --UMItag Auto --cellTAG CB --gzip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: