generated from r4ds/bookclub-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
/
16_methods-assessment.Rmd
40 lines (26 loc) · 1.15 KB
/
16_methods-assessment.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
# Methods assessment
**Learning objectives:**
- learn good practices in model evaluation
## Overview {-}
Determining predictive performance of a spatial interpolation method requires:
- a method to obtain training and testing datasets
- a choice of the predictive performance measure (applied to each testing dataset)
## Obtaining training and testing datasets {-}
- K-fold or leave-one-out (LOOCV) cross validation (see chapter 13 for example code)
- splitting is preferably done by random sampling (Wadoux et al., 2021)
## Predictive performance measures {-}
- _not_ taking into account uncertainty of predictions:
- MAE (mean absolute error)
- RMSE (root mean square error)
- taking into account uncertainty of predictions:
- 95% CP (coverage probability): proportion of observations within the 95% prediction intervals
- CRPS (Continuous Ranked Probability Score): integration on the response scale of the squared difference between the predicted and the observed (degenarate) CDF.
## Meeting Videos {-}
### Cohort 1 {-}
`r knitr::include_url("https://www.youtube.com/embed/URL")`
<details>
<summary> Meeting chat log </summary>
```
LOG
```
</details>