Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add font preview, fix giant snake, and start adding missing 3.0 content #2432

Open
wants to merge 32 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pushfoo
Copy link
Member

@pushfoo pushfoo commented Oct 23, 2024

  1. Add missing font previews per Digi's feedback
  2. Stop the resource snake from being huge
  3. Rewrite front page to be punchier per Digi reactions / Minimal doc changes for 3.0 #2325 (comment)
  4. Make resource page sort order deterministic and configurable
  5. Explain 2.6.X plans somewhere other than issue comments and Discord
  6. Put the links include into rst_prolog where it belongs1
  7. Mark a lot of awful with # pending: post-3.0 cleanup

Footnotes

  1. Perhaps not how it belongs, but I am out of caring on this until 3.0's out

Copy link
Collaborator

@DragonMoffon DragonMoffon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done on my phone, so some messages are more curt than I'd usually do.

Looks good otherwise!

doc/about/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/about/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/about/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/about/faq.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/about/permissive_licensing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/index.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/index.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/index.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/index.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/create_resources_listing.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pushfoo pushfoo marked this pull request as draft October 24, 2024 11:42
@pushfoo pushfoo marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2024 01:21
@pushfoo pushfoo force-pushed the doc-add-font-preview-and-missing-3.0-content branch from 7112669 to d72de08 Compare October 27, 2024 18:04
@pushfoo
Copy link
Member Author

pushfoo commented Oct 27, 2024

I rebased this onto development branch.

* Add dir iteration abstraction

* Add TOCtree-friendly headings to resource folder instead of table headings

* Add hue-shifted quickfix for font previewing under the Font heading

* Add sorting for folders so we get consistent order on local and remote
* Remove unused code

* Explain why functions are doing things

* Tag ugly stuff with # pending: post-3.0 cleanup

* Pass the str function as the key for file list sorting

* Remove some cruft in process_resource_directory
* Move new doc overview to intro page

* Delete old intro page doc type listing

* Add skill tree ref target

* Delete a bunch of stuff from homepage
@pushfoo pushfoo force-pushed the doc-add-font-preview-and-missing-3.0-content branch from d72de08 to 3aa3618 Compare November 1, 2024 07:04
@pushfoo
Copy link
Member Author

pushfoo commented Nov 1, 2024

Changes:

  1. Removed out-of-scope section
  2. Rebased onto development

@DragonMoffon DragonMoffon self-requested a review November 13, 2024 12:31
Comment on lines +52 to +54
The Raspberry Pi 4 and 5 are known support Arcade under `Raspberry Pi OS`_,
and the Raspberry Pi 400 *may* also work. As of October 2024,
:ref:`All other other Raspberry Pi models are incompatible <sbc_unsupported_raspis>`.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd make this more confident, 'The Raspberry Pi 4 and 5 can run Arcade using Raspberry Pi OS_'

doc/about/for_academia.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +8 to +9
All parts of the library are available free of charge without
complicated red tape:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like '...free of charge or complicated red tape:' sounds better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants