upgrade to TF .12

[on4tux]

according to https://www.terraform.io/upgrade-guides/0-12.html#upgrading-terraform-providers, .11 providers need to upgraded to work with TF .12

[GraemeKnights]

I second this as being very desirable if somebody can manage it please? :)
No idea how much work is involved...

[RobCannon]

I have converted this to support terraform v0.12. I have one pull request that needs to be merged first, and then a second PR that builds on top of that.

[RobCannon]

Plus, I have support for using the new VS Code container build technology. You don't have to worry about what version of Go you have installed locally (or you don't even need it installed!). The container defines the development environment. It works pretty well. So, two more PR's waiting once #56 is accepted.

[JackBracken]

Thanks @RobCannon
Give me a few hours while I catch up to the other issues and PRs and I'll test. :)

[surskitt]

Apologies for asking both on here and the pull request, but is this still being considered? Would be really nice to have the provider working with terraform 0.12

[codyja]

Looking forward to this PR also! Thanks

[zackhorvath]

Currently in this boat as well - love the plugin!

[pescetto]

@RobCannon @prudhvitella You know if that PR is still open? I don't see it in there and I didn't see it being merged. Just hoping to get this provider updated soon. Thanks to all the contributors who've worked on this!

[RobCannon]

#56 is still open. I have moved onto another company, so i can't really test this module any more. I have the checkins and can submit them as PRs once #56 is committed, but I can't really support them.

[pescetto]

@prudhvitella any time frame on this if possible?

[surskitt]

@RobCannon you mentioned you can't support, would this mean you're not willing and/or able to create a fork and merge both of your pull requests into it?

[RobCannon]

My code is all here:
https://github.com/RobCannon/terraform-provider-infoblox

There are three branches, one supports modules, one is the update for terraform 0.12 and the third branch adds support for using vscode remote docker support (very handy to make sure all the right requirements are there for building).

[surskitt]

Thanks a lot @RobCannon . So do I just need to merge them on top of each other?

[RobCannon]

They are all branched from each other. So the vscoderemote has all of the changes.

[surskitt]

@RobCannon I've built from your branches and it all works great! I feel bad for taking so long to thank you.

All the more reason to get these PRs merged.

[ooOOJavaOOoo]

@prudhvitella any feedback on merging these?

[RobCannon]

@ooOOJavaOOoo Sorry, I am not familiar "license acceptance error".

[ooOOJavaOOoo]

@RobCannon sorry, had too many github threads going, getting the nul block error

Error: Provider produced invalid plan

Provider "infoblox" planned an invalid value for
module.infoblox_linux.infoblox_record_host.general[0].ipv6addr: attribute
representing a list of nested blocks must be empty to indicate no blocks, not
null.

Using terraform 0.12.8

[RobCannon]

Sorry, that it why I can't really support this. I don't have access to an F5 to try to replicate the issue.

Plus, I don't think that issue is a result of my changes. I didn't really make any changes to the core code. It might be due to a change in terraform types, through.

[wenesak]

How do you compile this provider?