Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2022. It is now read-only.

Consider renaming simulate to semantics #807

Open
satnam6502 opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Consider renaming simulate to semantics #807

satnam6502 opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@jadephilipoom
Labels
P2
Milestone
Silver Oak Phase 2

Comments

@satnam6502
Copy link
Contributor

Upon reflection, the word simulate is perhaps not the best choice and maybe we should revert to semantics or some other name that causes less confusion.
@satnam6502 satnam6502 added the P2 label Jun 2, 2021
@satnam6502 satnam6502 added this to the Silver Oak Phase 2 milestone Jun 2, 2021
@jadephilipoom
Copy link
Contributor

I agree that the name is a bit confusing, but semantics is currently what we call our Cava instances when defining circuits, so that particular replacement might cause name collisions. I'm struggling to think of other ideas -- run and interp both seem like they would cause just as much confusion.

@satnam6502
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good point. Let's noodle on this a bit: it's not urgent.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@jadephilipoom jadephilipoom

Labels
P2
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Silver Oak Phase 2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@satnam6502 @jadephilipoom