Creating a Dashboard for Interactive Data Visualization with Dash in Python #609
Comments
|
Hello @caiocmello and @hluling, You can find the key files here:
You can review a preview of the lesson here: I do have a question about two
How come these scripts are provided separately, rather than included as code blocks within the lesson? (I am slightly confused about how these scripts differ from the main code, which you've collated together under app.py.) Thank you for clarifying! |
|
Thank you for processing these files, @charlottejmc! Hello Luling @hluling, What's happening now?Your lesson has been moved to the next phase of our workflow which is Phase 2: Initial Edit. In this Phase, your editor Caio @caiocmello will read your lesson, and provide some initial feedback. Caio will post feedback and suggestions as a comment in this Issue, so that you can revise your draft in the following Phase 3: Revision 1. %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {
'cScale0': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel0': '#ffffff',
'cScale1': '#882b4f', 'cScaleLabel1': '#ffffff',
'cScale2': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel2': '#ffffff'
} } }%%
timeline
Section Phase 1 <br> Submission
Who worked on this? : Publishing Assistant (@charlottejmc)
All Phase 1 tasks completed? : Yes
Section Phase 2 <br> Initial Edit
Who's working on this? : Editor (@caiocmello)
Expected completion date? : May 17
Section Phase 3 <br> Revision 1
Who's responsible? : Author (@hluling)
Expected timeframe? : ~30 days after feedback is received
|
Thank you @charlottejmc. To clarify:
The two RQs are based on two different data sources. The reason to separate |
|
Thank you @hluling, that makes good sense to me now. Anisa and I did find this slightly confusing upon initial processing of the lesson, so this might indicate it will be confusing to readers as well. One solution would be to keep the code in a separate asset folder, but give clearer instructions to readers explaining this choice. I will let @caiocmello share his view on this too! |
|
Dear @hluling, It has been such a pleasure reading your lesson. I've learnt a lot from it and I'm sure it will be of great contribution to the PH! So, thanks very much for this! I took note of some suggestions I could provide you at this stage before it goes to external review. I hope they are useful in improving the accessibility and usability of this material. Comments below indicate the paragraph, as annotated in the preview version.
It was great to see that you included more than one research question in the lesson. Also, you provide a different set-up of the dashboard, showing how readers can customise it in different ways. This is excellent. I have, however, some suggestions regarding the way the RQs are structured in the text:
Final comment:
These are my initial suggestions and I look forward to hearing back from you. I hope this is useful and feel free to get in touch if you have any questions. |
|
Thank you very much @caiocmello – just a short note to let you and @hluling know that I've just taken care of switching the two asset links at paragraphs 39 and 41. |
|
Thank you @caiocmello for the insightful feedback! I'm working on the edits. |
|
Hello Luling @hluling, If you'd like to slot in some figure images, please either upload them to your repository where we can download them or email to us as before. Charlotte and I will process these next week and put them in place for you! Thank you, |
What's happening now?Hello Luling @hluling. Your lesson has been moved to the next phase of our workflow which is Phase 3: Revision 1. This Phase is an opportunity for you to revise your draft in response to @caiocmello's initial feedback. I've sent you an invitation to join us as an Outside Collaborator here on GitHub. This gives you the Write access you'll need to edit your lesson directly. We ask authors to work on their own files with direct commits: we prefer you don't fork our repo, or use the Pull Request system to edit in ph-submissions. You can make direct commits to your file here: /en/drafts/originals/interactive-data-visualization-dashboard.md. Charlotte and I can help if you encounter any practical problems! When you and Caio are both happy with the revised draft, we will move forward to Phase 4: Open Peer Review. %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {
'cScale0': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel0': '#ffffff',
'cScale1': '#882b4f', 'cScaleLabel1': '#ffffff',
'cScale2': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel2': '#ffffff'
} } }%%
timeline
Section Phase 2 <br> Initial Edit
Who worked on this? : Editor (@caiocmello)
All Phase 2 tasks completed? : Yes
Section Phase 3 <br> Revision 1
Who's working on this? : Author (@hluling)
Expected completion date? : June 12
Section Phase 4 <br> Open Peer Review
Who's responsible? : Reviewers (TBC)
Expected timeframe? : ~60 days after request is accepted
|
|
Hi @caiocmello, thanks again for the thorough review! Please see the revised lesson here: https://programminghistorian.github.io/ph-submissions/en/drafts/originals/interactive-data-visualization-dashboard
Revised as suggested (now in Paragraph 9).
Revised as suggested (now in Paragraph 30).
This is a great idea. I added Figure 1 and Figure 2 showing screenshots for the two dashboard.
I agree. I added Figure 3 and Figure 4 showing screenshots for the two datasets.
I've revised and adjusted the language about the role of the two RQs (Paragraphs 4 and 27).
I've added a link to download the dataset directly (Paragraph 48).
The added Figure 2 shows a screenshot of the RQ2 dashboard. |
|
Hi Anisa @anisa-hawes (thanks for the reply!) and @charlottejmc, I've placed the 4 figures here: https://github.com/hluling/ph-dash/tree/master/interactive-data-visualization-dashboard. You can find the figure placeholders in the revised lesson draft: https://programminghistorian.github.io/ph-submissions/en/drafts/originals/interactive-data-visualization-dashboard Also a quick note: I updated some files here: https://github.com/programminghistorian/ph-submissions/tree/gh-pages/assets/interactive-data-visualization-dashboard |
|
Thank you @hluling, I've uploaded your four images and updated the placeholder links in the markdown file. |
|
Hi @hluling, It looks great! Thanks for the rapid response and for your engagement in the process! @anisa-hawes and @charlottejmc will process the lesson to the next stage of external peer-reviewing. I will write to you soon once reviewers are assigned. Best wishes, |
|
Hella @hawc2, if @caiocmello is indeed happy with the lesson at this stage, then it is ready for your final read-through before we move it to Phase 6. Thank you! |
|
Dear @charlottejmc, I have revised this draft and I am happy for it to move on to Phase 6. Thanks very much @hluling for your work on this piece and for your careful editions, following the recommendations of reviewers. |
|
Thank you, @caiocmello. Hello Luling @hluling, The Managing Editor Alex @hawc2 will also read the lesson to confirm if it should be moved onwards to Phase 6, or if he'd like to suggest some further revisions. Thank you, |
|
Hi @hluling, my apologies for delays getting back to you with my review - the start of the semester swept things away. This is looking really interesting, but there are some sections of the code that seem to be too briefly described. There’s a few changes I’d recommend making to the framing and presentation of key details. I’ve made a round of line-edits where you can see some of the simple changes I made to the table of contents, headings, and the wording of some sections. Right now the intro section focuses on showing the final dashboard images the lesson will produce. But this information would be better to save for the end of the lesson. Instead, spend more time in the intro discussing the datasets and general types of data visualizations you will produce. It’s not clear in the intro what kind of graph will be viewable in the end, and it’s not concrete what the publicly available data sources are that you selected to answer your research questions. You end up going into detail about that below, but you might as well say concretely what they are the first time you mention them. This is a difficult lesson that requires some base knowledge of Python and deploying code, and it may be helpful to add some more prerequisite lessons and helpful references/guidelines for some of those complicated steps (like running Python in the command line when you first mention it). All the sections that begin “Code explanation” shouldn’t include that phrase, they should just actually describe the code. These sections could all afford to include more commentary about the code. Ideally you have commentary before and after the code, so instead of just citing code and then providing one paragraph describing the code, weave the commentary before and after the code. Ideally code chunks are less long, and there’s more detail per each chunk of code. You do say that for Q2 you don't provide commentary because it's similar to Q1, but you should still provide some commentary to direct the reader. Please take a look at most of our published lessons, and you will get a better idea of the custom for citing and discussing code. Once you've made those revisions, I can take a final look over it for any other lingering questions relating to the overall structure and last section. Some of the formatting and related presentation of information will continue to get revised after we send this on for copyedits and for the publishing manager to review. Please let me know if you have questions! |
|
Looking more at your lesson, @hluling, I'm not sure it's even worth keeping RQ2. You give so little time to walking through it, I feel like it's a distraction, and it might be easier to just have 1 research question this whole lesson focuses on? It is already quite difficult, and tracking two different Research Questions and datasets is alot to follow |
|
@hluling as an alternate solution, I think what would be best is to keep the content but change the framing. I would move away from the heading sections being titled Research Question 1 and 2, and actually give those sections content titles that refer to what the section is about. You could reorganize the essay so it is less about two research questions, and more about, the second part serving as an extension of the first part to show extended features of the tool through a secondary research question. That research question and the data could be brought later, after you've shown everything for what you've currently labeled RQ1. That RQ1 is the majority of the whole lesson, so it doesn't make sense to divide it up as if it's a part 1 of a two part lesson. The RQ2 section could be converted into a discussion of extensions of Dash using a secondary research question and dataset that you introduce when those features come up. The conclusion could use more discussion, tying together all these loose threads. What are the key methodologies you are teaching for people to advance their research and its presentation? Can you resummarize and elaborate on those here. Feel free to take a few paragraphs to wrap up. I made substantial line-edits to some areas to break up long paragraphs and show you how code should have comments woven in. In a few places I added comments in brackets where I'm asking you to elaborate more on the code. Generally avoid comments inline of code when it can serve as preface or subsequent explanation after code. Lots of our recent lessons will offer good examples of how to write more extended discussions of code. For example, when you cite a pandas dataframe for the first time, explain what it is, or provide a link to a secondary resource (wikipedia is fine). That kind of detail will really help guide the reader who isn't already pretty familiar with this type of work. If you can explain in more detail what a code is doing, what the purpose of each function is to that step in the process, that would be helpful, even if it's a brief sentence or two per line/chunk of code. The later sections on deployment, especially, are going to be difficult for people. Running Python code is already not the most user-friendly, so using Github and Render are going to need alot of helping hands I'd think. We will label this lesson the highest difficulty. But if you can find more ways to provide guidelines and tips, please do. In a similar way, you could make the Jupyter notebook available as a functional Colab notebook for ease of running. The more you can explain, even just in a few sentences, how to run Python code in the command line, as well, the more likelihood people will be able to use your lesson. Finally, I'd recommend adding more images. As I said before, ideally you don't show the end result until the end of the lesson. I replicated the images from the front near where they should appear at the end. But they shouldn't appear twice. Could the first ones be just one general image pulled from dash's website showcasing what the tool can do? Ideally you have more images throughout the lesson, not all frontloaded in the first half. So take a moment to consider what other images can you include earlier to give the reader a sense of the methodologies you will be teaching to advance their research? |
|
Hello Luling @hluling, What's happening now?Your lesson remains in Phase 5: Revision 2. The Managing Editor Alex @hawc2 has made some additional suggestions following Caio's @caiocmello. Feel free to ask Alex or Caio further questions if you are unsure. You can make revisions via direct commits to your file: /en/drafts/originals/interactive-data-visualization-dashboard.md. And, as always, @charlottejmc and I are here to help if you encounter any difficulties. I've plotted in the revised timeframes for this Phase: %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {
'cScale0': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel0': '#ffffff',
'cScale1': '#882b4f', 'cScaleLabel1': '#ffffff',
'cScale2': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel2': '#ffffff'
} } }%%
timeline
Section Phase 4 <br> Open Peer Review
Who worked on this? : Reviewers (@dfvalio+ @jobreu)
All Phase 4 tasks completed? : Yes
Section Phase 5 <br> Revision 2
Who's working on this? : Author (@hluling)
Expected completion date? : November 2
Section Phase 6 <br> Sustainability + Accessibility
Who's responsible? : Publishing Team
Expected timeframe? : 7~21 days
|
|
Thanks, Alex @hawc2 for the detailed feedback and edits! I'll work on the revision. |
|
Thank you for your email, Luling @hluling. To confirm, we're looking forwards to receiving your revisions in early November. I've adjusted the timeframes above. Please don't hesitate to write to us if you have questions in the meantime 🙂 |
|
Hi Alex @hawc2, thanks again for the comments and edits. I've revised the lesson based on your feedback. Here is a summary of the revisions:
I hope that I have addressed the comments successfully. Please let me know if any further revision is needed. |
|
Thank you, Luling @hluling. We appreciate your work on these revisions. -- Hello Alex @hawc2, Please let us know when you've had time to review these revisions. |
|
@hluling thank you for these thorough revisions, the lesson is much improved. It's an excellent exploration of building dashboards. @caiocmello could you look this over one last time and share any thoughts for revision before we send this to copyedits? My only immediate thought for revision is mostly something we can address in copyedits: some of the section headings aren't very explanatory of what that section is like, such as down in the Extended Use Case area where there's a heading that's just Dataset. I still plan to test the Colab notebook, make sure the code works still as expected, and come back separately if there are any changes I'd recommend for it. We can finalize the notebook after copyedits. |
anisa-hawes
moved this from 5 Revision 2
to 6 Sustainability + Accessibility
in Active Lessons
|
Hello Luling @hluling, What's happening now?Your lesson has been moved to the next phase of our workflow which is Phase 6: Sustainability + Accessibility. In this phase, our publishing team will coordinate a series of tasks including: copyediting, typesetting, generating archival links, collating copyright agreements, and reviewing essential metadata.
When our Sustainability + Accessibility actions are complete, the Managing Editor @hawc2 will read the lesson through one final time ahead of publication. %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {
'cScale0': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel0': '#ffffff',
'cScale1': '#882b4f', 'cScaleLabel1': '#ffffff',
'cScale2': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel2': '#ffffff'
} } }%%
timeline
Section Phase 5 <br> Revision 2
Who worked on this? : Author (@hluling)
All Phase 5 tasks completed? : Yes
Section Phase 6 <br> Sustainability + Accessibility
Who's working on this? : Publishing Team
Expected completion date? : ~21 days
Section Phase 7 <br> Publication
Who's responsible? : Managing Editor @hawc2
Expected timeframe? : ~10 days
|
|
Hello @hluling, This lesson is now with me for copyediting. I aim to complete the work by ~21 November. Please note that you won't have direct access to make further edits to your files during this phase. Any further revisions can be discussed with your editor @caiocmello after copyedits are complete. Thank you for your understanding. |
|
Hello @hluling and @caiocmello, I've prepared a PR with the copyedits for your review. There, you'll be able to review the 'rich-diff' to see my edits in detail. You'll also find brief instructions for how to reply to any questions or comments which came up during the copyedit. When you're both happy, we can merge in the PR. |
|
Hello @hawc2, This lesson's sustainability + accessibility checks are in progress.
Publisher's sustainability + accessibility actions:
Authorial / editorial input to YAML:
Files we are preparing for transfer to Jekyll:
Promotion:
Publisher's post-publication tasks:
|
|
Hi @hluling, What do you think about this thumbnail for your lesson? I think it represents the title 'interactive data visualization' rather well! I also found this chart which could work, although it's not as playful as the first option. Feel free to suggest your own images too (following the guidance above). |
|
Thanks @charlottejmc, the first one looks great and let's use it! I also just emailed you the copyright agreement. |
|
Hi @hluling, we are very close to being able to publish your lesson. The final thing we need is your author bio, written in the following format:
Thank you very much for all your work and energy so far! |
|
Hello Luling @hluling, What's happening now?Your lesson has been moved to the final phase of our workflow which is Phase 7: Publication. In this phase, the Managing Editor @hawc2 will read your lesson through one more time, to provide final feedback or suggest additional revisions. When you, your Editor @caiocmello and the Managing Editor @hawc2 all agree that the lesson is ready, I will stage it for publication. %%{init: { 'logLevel': 'debug', 'theme': 'dark', 'themeVariables': {
'cScale0': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel0': '#ffffff',
'cScale1': '#882b4f', 'cScaleLabel1': '#ffffff',
'cScale2': '#444444', 'cScaleLabel2': '#ffffff'
} } }%%
timeline
Section Phase 6 <br> Sustainability + Accessibility
Who worked on this? : Publishing Team
All Phase 6 tasks completed? : Author bio needed
Section Phase 7 <br> Publication
Who's working on this? : Managing Editor @hawc2
Expected timeframe? : ~10 days
|
|
Thanks @charlottejmc! Here is the author bio: name: Luling Huang |
|
@charlottejmc the copy edits look great, I see a few small line edits I would like to make, but before I do that, I think we might want to change the TOC in a couple places and reorder a section or two to make this lesson a little more streamlined. @anisa-hawes I'm thinking we should give this another week or so or time to further revision, and aim to publish by mid-late December.
@hluling This draft has gone through some reordering and revision, and I'm worried there may be one or two explainers that now need to be clarified earlier or connected between sections. Would you like to also re-read it to double check?
It's generally best at this point that we keep further line edits to the Markdown file to a minimum, so make sure to use pull requests if you do any further edits to the file @hluling |
|
Hi @hawc2, Thank you for your detailed read-through!
|
Programming Historian in English has received a proposal for a lesson, 'Creating a Dashboard for Interactive Data Visualization with Dash in Python' by @hluling.
I have circulated this proposal for feedback within the English team. We have considered this proposal for:
We are pleased to have invited @hluling to develop this Proposal into a Submission to be developed under the guidance of @caiocmello as editor.
The Submission package should include:
We ask @hluling to share their Submission package with our Publishing team by email, copying in @caiocmello .
We've agreed a submission date of April. We ask @hluling to contact us if they need to revise this deadline.
When the Submission package is received, our Publishing team will process the new lesson materials, and prepare a Preview of the initial draft. They will post a comment in this Issue to provide the locations of all key files, as well as a link to the Preview where contributors can read the lesson as the draft progresses.
If we have not received the Submission package by April, @caiocmello will attempt to contact @hluling. If we do not receive any update, this Issue will be closed.
Our dedicated Ombudspersons are Ian Milligan (English), Silvia Gutiérrez De la Torre (español), Hélène Huet (français), and Luis Ferla (português) Please feel free to contact them at any time if you have concerns that you would like addressed by an impartial observer. Contacting the ombudspersons will have no impact on the outcome of any peer review.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: