-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing the structures with large distortions #357
Comments
Yes, you can use the |
How should i decide the cutoff to remove any structure? |
You could try fitting iteratively to see how the fit performs, or find the score for a distortion that you know about. You can query |
{
|
That score is quite large. If you look at the relaxed structure, is it similar to the starting structure? Also, is the structure near your convex hull? |
No, the relaxed structures looks highly distorted. Mostly the structures in my case have this much deformation costs, but CE could predict their energies except some structures, i have RMS value of 11 meV/atom. Structures near the hull are highly distorted ones having the atomic deformation scores more than 0.3. |
Is it possible that there is another parent crystal structure for that region? For example, you can have relaxations going to FCC, BCC, HCP - you would need a separate project for each parent. Also, do you have vacancies? If so, you may be finding highly distorted structures such as Na15Sn4. |
What do you mean by another parent crystal? Sn has two crystal structures i.e., BCT and DC, so i took the BCT one and constructed my CE based on that, but there are large distortions almost at every Na composition. but CE could predict the energies with an RMS of 10 meV/atom. there is no clear trend between the predicted energy and the distortions. No, i don't have vacancies. |
There are some intermetallics for this system. Moreover, since CE could predict the energies of distorted structures within a reasonable error, what should i do? By including the configurations with the very large distortion and CE predicting them with very less error, aren't we predicting the energy of the configuration incorrectly? |
We usually make one cluster expansion for each parent structure, such as one for FCC and one for BCC, and then filter the relaxed structures so that they match the parent structure.
If you are satisfied with the error, then I think it is okay, but just be aware that with deformation scores that large you could be mixing different parent crystal structures together. |
Should i remove the structures with very large distortions, as CE is not able to predict those correctly. few are the DFT ground state structures also and CE is not predicting them, what should i do? any suggestions? how should i remove them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: