Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Agree and document contribution guidelines & PR process #22

Open
planetf1 opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Agree and document contribution guidelines & PR process #22

planetf1 opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@planetf1
Copy link
Contributor

We need to clearly articulate the roles/responsibilities of parties involved in the code submission process, and how that process is executed. Ideally having some consistency within pq-code-package would be desirable

This should likely be places on our code documentation site (when agreed) and linked to from CONTRIBUTING.md in each repo

Specifically commit (merge / squash / rebase) should be considered. projects vary in their preference. I've tended to use merge, despite the noise (it seems much of k8s does too?) despite the merge commit noise

Lots of other areas to cover - getting started, code submission guidelines, local build/test, creating a good pr, release notes/docs impacts, templates, ci/cd checks, approval process/assignment .....

@planetf1 planetf1 moved this to Backlog in TSC tracking Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant