-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
emphasis
and link
questions
#17
Comments
We allow for selecting the typeface of three key content groups: We could allow varying typeface for other fields for consistency, but that's much more of an edge case (from a design perspective) and not a common need. I certainly see an argument for moving color of things like headings, emphasis, links, etc. to |
Looking at this section of the spec again, I think we should have typography:
base:
headings:
monospace:
bold:
italic:
link: |
I like it. (We'll inevitably get a bug report about What do you think about my |
ICYMI I had thoughts about color and font family in a comment above. |
See #16. |
I don't understand why we allow typefaces to change from
base
toheadings
, but not toemphasis
orlink
.And similarly to #16, I think the color configuration of these should be done by known names in
color
, and not intypography
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: