Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does sophia support armv6l architecture #172

Open
pzhin opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Does sophia support armv6l architecture #172

pzhin opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@pzhin
Copy link

pzhin commented Feb 5, 2019

Does sophia support armv6l architecture? I tried to run tests on raspberry emulator and got such error.

$ make banner 
SOPHIA 2.2 (git: 941cc49)

$ uname -a
Linux raspberrypi 4.4.34+ #3 Thu Dec 1 14:44:23 IST 2016 armv6l GNU/Linux

$ cc --version
cc (Raspbian 6.3.0-18+rpi1+deb9u1) 6.3.0 20170516

$ ./sophia-test 

sophia test-suite.

Tue, 05 Feb 19 12:47:43 +0000

test combinations: 6920

00% [00:00:00:0] unit.ssa.malloc: ok
00% [00:00:01:0] unit.ssa.realloc: ok
00% [00:01:00:0] unit.ssorder.of: ok
00% [00:01:01:0] unit.ssorder.name: ok
00% [00:02:00:0] unit.ssrq.test0: ok
00% [00:02:01:0] unit.ssrq.test1: ok
00% [00:02:02:0] unit.ssrq.test2: ok
00% [00:02:03:0] unit.ssrq.test3: ok
00% [00:02:04:0] unit.ssrq.test4: ok
00% [00:02:05:0] unit.ssrq.test5: ok
00% [00:02:06:0] unit.ssrq.test6: ok
00% [00:02:07:0] unit.ssrq.test7: ok
00% [00:02:08:0] unit.ssrq.test8: ok
00% [00:03:00:0] unit.ssht.test0: ok
00% [00:04:00:0] unit.sszstdfilter.compress_decompress: ok
00% [00:05:00:0] unit.sslz4filter.compress_decompress: ok
00% [00:06:00:0] unit.srconf.set_ns: ok
00% [00:06:01:0] unit.srconf.set_ns_trigger: ok
00% [00:06:02:0] unit.srconf.set_u32: ok
00% [00:06:03:0] unit.srconf.set_ns_u32: ok
00% [00:06:04:0] unit.srconf.set_ns_ns_u32_0: ok
00% [00:06:05:0] unit.srconf.set_ns_ns_u32_1: ok
00% [00:06:06:0] unit.srconf.set_ns_ns_u32_bad: ok
00% [00:06:07:0] unit.srconf.serialize0: ok
00% [00:07:00:0] unit.sfscheme.save_load: ok
00% [00:08:00:0] unit.svv.kv: ok
00% [00:09:00:0] unit.svindex.replace0: ok
00% [00:10:00:0] unit.svindexiter.lte_empty: ok
00% [00:10:01:0] unit.svindexiter.lte_eq: ok
00% [00:10:02:0] unit.svindexiter.lt_eq: ok
00% [00:10:03:0] unit.svindexiter.gte_empty: ok
00% [00:10:04:0] unit.svindexiter.gte_eq: ok
00% [00:10:05:0] unit.svindexiter.gt_eq: ok
00% [00:10:06:0] unit.svindexiter.iterate0: ok
00% [00:10:07:0] unit.svindexiter.iterate1: ok
00% [00:11:00:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_a: ok
00% [00:11:01:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_b: ok
00% [00:11:02:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_ab: ok
00% [00:11:03:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_abc: ok
00% [00:11:04:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_ba: ok
00% [00:11:05:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_dup_ab: ok
00% [00:11:06:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_dup_a_chain: ok
00% [00:11:07:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_dup_ab_chain: ok
00% [00:11:08:0] unit.svmergeiter.merge_dup_abc_chain: ok
00% [00:12:00:0] unit.svwriteiter.iter: ok
00% [00:12:01:0] unit.svwriteiter.iter_limit: fail (unit/sv_writeiter.test.c:127) i == 5
Aborted
@pzhin
Copy link
Author

pzhin commented Feb 5, 2019

When i disabled all svwriteiter tests, i got segmentation fault in github.ticket_171 test. And then next failed test was only multithread.mt_backend.set_delete_get

99% [07:00:00:0] multithread.mt_backend.set_delete_get 0.1M 0.2M 0.3M 0.4M 0.5M 0.6M 0.1M 0.2M: fail (multithread/multithread_be.test.c:71) sp_delete(db, o) == 0
Aborted

@pzhin
Copy link
Author

pzhin commented Mar 4, 2019

@pmwkaa ping

@satta
Copy link

satta commented May 5, 2020

@pmwkaa any progress on this? Just wondering... this is still an issue affecting, for example, the Debian package.

@satta
Copy link

satta commented Nov 3, 2021

@pmwkaa any ideas in the meantime?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants