Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

There should be a peel word #20

Open
pmachata opened this issue Feb 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

There should be a peel word #20

pmachata opened this issue Feb 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@pmachata
Copy link
Owner

pmachata commented Feb 9, 2015

It is awkward, error prone, and not future-proof to have to write ((?DW_TAG_const_type || ?DW_TAG_volatile_type || ...) @DW_AT_type)*. A new peelable DW_TAG_atomic_type will be added to Dwarf 5, so clearly future-proofing is necessary.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pmachata