Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I agree - I'll speak to Fabian about why their |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As I described in #111
Some operator is missing currently.
While I was figuring out the AST tree structure for operators, I found "new" operator which is not in the schema.
It is not part of schema but.. In my opinion, it is needed definitely. Better than unknown node.
In addition, I linked a url which can be used for inferencing AST tree structure of .instanceOf.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions