Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

phys2denoise 1.0 #13

Open
smoia opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

phys2denoise 1.0 #13

smoia opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
Discussion Discussion of a concept or implementation. Need to stay always open.

Comments

@smoia
Copy link
Member

smoia commented Nov 10, 2020

@physiopy/all , I'm opening this issue so that we can start tracking the development of phys2denoise, but especially so that we can decide what do we expect from it before promoting it out of testing stages.

Please feel free to add ideas and start a discussion!

@smoia smoia added the Discussion Discussion of a concept or implementation. Need to stay always open. label Nov 10, 2020
@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Nov 13, 2020

Do you want to organize 1.0 into a project board or make a milestone?

@eurunuela
Copy link

Do you want to organize 1.0 into a project board or make a milestone?

I'm pro project board!

@smoia
Copy link
Member Author

smoia commented Nov 14, 2020

I'm normally pro-milestone, but I don't think we have a deadline and hey, learning new things is fun.
Here's the project board for phys2denoise 1.0.

Let's keep this issue open for discussion around necessary steps to get to 1.0

@RayStick
Copy link
Member

RayStick commented Jan 14, 2021

I'm happy to add my perspective on what may be helpful to include in the phys2denoise package. What is the best way to do that - on this thread, on separate issues, on the project board (<How best should that be used?)? Thanks.

@CesarCaballeroGaudes
Copy link
Collaborator

Count on me (depending on my time and my limited expertise)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Discussion of a concept or implementation. Need to stay always open.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants