-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation: Questionnaires vignette intro needs updating #2586
Comments
@manciniedoardo , why do you think it is not accurate anymore? If extension packages provide something for specific questionnaires, we could add a reference on the questionnaires vignette. |
I be interested in highlighting some of the power of the extension packages for questionnaires! The intro/statement still sounds true to me?? |
Sorry, I probably should have specified what I meant by not accurate. To my knowledge, this bit "e.g. a metadata structure for storing parameter definitions and functions for reading such metadata. We plan to provide it in future releases." is inaccurate as we don't have plans. As you guys mention I'd rather highlight the power of ext packages. |
ooohhh the mention of the json file for grading stuff has me thinking more on this...maybe we do have a "plan" :) |
maybe an item for our 2025 roadmap? |
love it! |
Have added to my notes, will close this issue for now. |
Is this going in a 1.3 - 2.0 Roadmap Discussion thread!?! |
Please select a category the issue is focused on?
User Guides
Let us know where something needs a refresh or put your idea here!
The intro to the Questionnaires ADaM User Guide reads:
At the moment, admiral does not provide functions or metadata for specific questionnaires nor functionality for handling the vast amount of questionnaires and related parameters, e.g. a metadata structure for storing parameter definitions and functions for reading such metadata. We plan to provide it in future releases.
I don't think this is accurate anymore. I propose to just cut, and if anything say only that specific questionnaires are sometimes addressed in extension packages.
@bms63 thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: