-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 627
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RPC Tests #241
Comments
Python unittest has as a decorator that can be applied to the entire test class. Also I think the So you could do something like:
|
I think that better command to test that the daemon responds is |
For me, simply instantiating a Proxy with an attempted connection yields the desired result. Please let me know if you get different results. Perhaps we could add a For reference, I implemented this in #242. |
@dgpv has good points, @SachinMeier
Let me know if I'm missing an assumed configuration for running the tests. |
I get a different result. All my tests pass. I can add a single call to the |
hey @SachinMeier, Calling So I think the reason we are seeing different errors is that if a user has the If the |
Currently, RPC Tests are commented out because bitcoind must be running to test them. I am thinking this should change to check if bitcoind is running. I am unsure of the best implementation, but this is what I am thinking. I was hoping to get feedback before I open a PR.
test_rpc.py:
We can then have each test begin by checking
_IS_ACTIVE
and passing if not.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: