Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using RTT deadline reports 100% packet loss #1423

Closed
szymontrocha opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Using RTT deadline reports 100% packet loss #1423

szymontrocha opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@szymontrocha
Copy link

Reported from user list.

I also observed it (tested under Ubuntu20, perfSONAR 5.0.8)

$ pscheduler task rtt -d 150.254.173.3 --deadline PT20S
Submitting task...
Task URL:
https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/208e7d71-139c-4a89-9fb1-3bf74c7b04d6
Running with tool 'ping'
Fetching first run...

Next scheduled run:
https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/208e7d71-139c-4a89-9fb1-3bf74c7b04d6/runs/49a9d248-7f13-413e-98b7-37c92fff77c4
Starts 2024-03-21T08:55:05+00:00 (~0 seconds)
Ends   2024-03-21T08:55:16+00:00 (~10 seconds)
Waiting for result...

100% Packet Loss  RTT Min/Mean/Max/StdDev = Unknown/Unknown/Unknown/Unknown ms

No further runs scheduled.
$ pscheduler task rtt -d 150.254.173.3
Submitting task...
Task URL:
https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/47c935ac-1146-4364-942d-1fccef6ef12a
Running with tool 'ping'
Fetching first run...

Next scheduled run:
https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/47c935ac-1146-4364-942d-1fccef6ef12a/runs/537009a8-380a-4c7d-afc0-c79d582cd148
Starts 2024-03-21T08:56:00+00:00 (~1 seconds)
Ends   2024-03-21T08:56:11+00:00 (~10 seconds)
Waiting for result...

1       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.4900 ms
2       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.5200 ms
3       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.1800 ms
4       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.5000 ms
5       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.3000 ms

0% Packet Loss  RTT Min/Mean/Max/StdDev = 2.181000/2.397000/2.524000/0.133000 ms

No further runs scheduled.
$ pscheduler result --diags https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/208e7d71-139c-4a89-9fb1-3bf74c7b04d6
2024-03-21T08:55:05+00:00 on psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl with ping:

https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/208e7d71-139c-4a89-9fb1-3bf74c7b04d6/runs/49a9d248-7f13-413e-98b7-37c92fff77c4

rtt --dest 150.254.173.3 --deadline PT20S

100% Packet Loss  RTT Min/Mean/Max/StdDev = Unknown/Unknown/Unknown/Unknown ms

Limit system diagnostics for this run:
  Hints:
    requester: 2001:808:2:3004:2::2
    server: 2001:808:2:3004:2::2
  Identified as everybody, local-interfaces
  Classified as default, friendlies
  Application: Hosts we trust to do everything
    Group 1: Limit 'always' passed
    Group 1: Want all, 1/1 passed, 0/1 failed: PASS
    Application PASSES
  Passed one application.  Stopping.
  Proposal meets limits
  Priority set at 0:
    Initial priority  (Set to 0)

Diagnostics from psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl:
  ping -n -c 5 -i 1.0 -w 20.0 -W 1.0 150.254.173.3


$ pscheduler result --diags https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/47c935ac-1146-4364-942d-1fccef6ef12a
2024-03-21T08:56:00+00:00 on psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl with ping:

https://psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl/pscheduler/tasks/47c935ac-1146-4364-942d-1fccef6ef12a/runs/537009a8-380a-4c7d-afc0-c79d582cd148

rtt --dest 150.254.173.3

1       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.4900 ms
2       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.5200 ms
3       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.1800 ms
4       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.5000 ms
5       rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3)  64 Bytes  TTL 60  RTT   2.3000 ms

0% Packet Loss  RTT Min/Mean/Max/StdDev = 2.181000/2.397000/2.524000/0.133000 ms

Limit system diagnostics for this run:
  Hints:
    requester: 2001:808:2:3004:2::2
    server: 2001:808:2:3004:2::2
  Identified as everybody, local-interfaces
  Classified as default, friendlies
  Application: Hosts we trust to do everything
    Group 1: Limit 'always' passed
    Group 1: Want all, 1/1 passed, 0/1 failed: PASS
    Application PASSES
  Passed one application.  Stopping.
  Proposal meets limits
  Priority set at 0:
    Initial priority  (Set to 0)

Diagnostics from psmall-poz1.man.poznan.pl:
  ping -n -c 5 -i 1.0 -W 1.0 150.254.173.3

  PING 150.254.173.3 (150.254.173.3) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from 150.254.173.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=2.49 ms
  64 bytes from 150.254.173.3: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=2.52 ms
  64 bytes from 150.254.173.3: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=2.18 ms
  64 bytes from 150.254.173.3: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=2.50 ms
  64 bytes from 150.254.173.3: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=2.30 ms

  --- 150.254.173.3 ping statistics ---
  5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4007ms
  rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.181/2.397/2.524/0.133 ms

$
@mfeit-internet2
Copy link
Member

Later versions of ping don't accept floating-point numbers as deadlines.

Need to fix that and make the ping plugin's run method be able to distinguish between an exit code of 1 because the remote host didn't answer and a real error like this one.

@mfeit-internet2 mfeit-internet2 self-assigned this Mar 21, 2024
@mfeit-internet2 mfeit-internet2 moved this from Ready to In Progress in perfSONAR Mar 21, 2024
mfeit-internet2 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in perfSONAR Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants