Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sensors on/off descriptions are misleading (triggered/not triggered) #109

Open
palazzem opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@palazzem
Copy link
Owner

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

From @eliciogiuseppe (#103):

STATO SENSORI acceso/spento:
Inizialmente avevo inteso che i sensori fossero accessi/spenti quando inclusi o esclusi. in realtà, In caso di sensori volumetrici sono sempre spenti. Si accendono solo quando scattano. Quindi lo stato potrebbe portare a fraintendimenti tra acceso/spento e inclusi/esclusi

Translation (via ChatGPT):

Initially, I had understood that the sensors were on/off when included or excluded. In reality, in the case of volumetric sensors, they are always off. They only turn on when triggered. Therefore, the status might lead to confusion between on/off and included/excluded.

Describe the solution you'd like

Probably we should call the state differently, or anyway make it clear. On/off means that it works or not, and so an alarm user you think the sensor is enabled/disabled (included/excluded). This is misleading and we should change the wording.

Describe alternatives you've considered

n/a

Additional context

n/a

@palazzem
Copy link
Owner Author

We can revisit this issue when we work on #80 . Keeping it open till then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant