Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can we have preformance test-case for texlive from fedora-rawhide? #277

Closed
2 tasks
praiskup opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #279
Closed
2 tasks

Can we have preformance test-case for texlive from fedora-rawhide? #277

praiskup opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #279
Labels
area/general Related to whole service, not a specific part/integration. complexity/single-task Regular task, should be done within days. gain/low This doesn't bring that much value to users. impact/low This issue impacts only a few users. kind/internal Doesn't affect users directly, may be e.g. infrastructure, DB related.

Comments

@praiskup
Copy link

Description

Everything is fine now; we are able to parse the specfile in ~30s. But it would be nice to never break this in the future.

originally discussed here fedora-copr/copr#2777

cc @FrostyX @lachmanfrantisek I promised to fill this issue

Benefit

No response

Importance

No response

Workaround

  • There is an existing workaround that can be used until this feature is implemented.

Participation

  • I am willing to submit a pull request for this issue. (Packit team is happy to help!)
@nforro nforro mentioned this issue Aug 21, 2023
Merged
@nforro nforro moved this from new to in-review in Packit Kanban Board Aug 21, 2023
@nforro nforro added area/general Related to whole service, not a specific part/integration. complexity/single-task Regular task, should be done within days. gain/low This doesn't bring that much value to users. impact/low This issue impacts only a few users. kind/internal Doesn't affect users directly, may be e.g. infrastructure, DB related. labels Aug 21, 2023
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2023
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Add performance test (#279)
bcc670c 
Add performance test

Fixes #277.

Reviewed-by: František Lachman <[email protected]>
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from in-review to done in Packit Kanban Board Sep 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/general Related to whole service, not a specific part/integration. complexity/single-task Regular task, should be done within days. gain/low This doesn't bring that much value to users. impact/low This issue impacts only a few users. kind/internal Doesn't affect users directly, may be e.g. infrastructure, DB related.
Projects
Packit Kanban Board
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add performance test packit/specfile
2 participants
@praiskup @nforro