Introduction
TBD
Constructing an HR diagram
# Include imports
+Constructing an HR diagram · Stellar Structure and Evolution Constructing an HR diagram
# Include imports
using DataFrames # Used to deal with tabular data
using Plots # Provides a multitude of plotting routines
using CSV # Efficient reading of files in "comma separated values" format
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
au = 1.5e13
Rsun = 7e10
plot!(xvals, pi*B_λ.(xvals,5772)/1e7/(au/Rsun)^2) # 1e7 factor converts from centimeter to nanometer
-plot!(solar_spectrum.lambda, solar_spectrum.flux) # columns in a dataframe can be easily accesible by name
In this exercise we will work with Gaia data. Gaia is a space mission that is performing astrometry of over a billion targets, providing an incredible picture on the structure of our Galaxy. Using parallaxes we can determine the distance to these stars and thus infer their absolute magnitudes. Gaia also provides photometric measurements in three bands, called $G$, $G_{RP}$ and $G_{BP}$. The G band is a broadband filter, while the $G_{RP}$ and $G_{BP}$ filters are more sensitive to short and long wavelengths respectively. The sensitivity of each filter to light at different wavelengths is described by the passbands, which are shown below compared to a (normalized) black body spectrum with the effective temperature of the Sun. For simplicity from here on we refer to the $G_{RP}$ and $G_{BP}$ filters as RP and BP.
# Visualize Gaia passbands
+plot!(solar_spectrum.lambda, solar_spectrum.flux) # columns in a dataframe can be easily accesible by name
In this exercise we will work with Gaia data. Gaia is a space mission that is performing astrometry of over a billion targets, providing an incredible picture on the structure of our Galaxy. Using parallaxes we can determine the distance to these stars and thus infer their absolute magnitudes. Gaia also provides photometric measurements in three bands, called $G$, $G_{RP}$ and $G_{BP}$. The G band is a broadband filter, while the $G_{RP}$ and $G_{BP}$ filters are more sensitive to short and long wavelengths respectively. The sensitivity of each filter to light at different wavelengths is described by the passbands, which are shown below compared to a (normalized) black body spectrum with the effective temperature of the Sun. For simplicity from here on we refer to the $G_{RP}$ and $G_{BP}$ filters as RP and BP.
# Visualize Gaia passbands
passbands = CSV.read("assets/passband.dat", header=1, delim=" ", ignorerepeated=true, DataFrame)
plot(xlabel=L"$\mathrm{Wavelength\;[nm]}$", ylabel=L"\mathrm{Transmissivity}", legendfontsize=10)
plot!(passbands.lambda, passbands.G_pb, label=L"$G$")
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
plot!(passbands.lambda, passbands.RP_pb, label=L"RP")
xvals = LinRange(200.0,1500.0,100)
-plot!(xvals, normalized_B_λ.(xvals,5772), label=L"$T=5772\;\mathrm{[K]}$")
The Gaia archive gives us a nice interface to query results from this mission (although queries are limited to 2000 results). Here we read a file gaia_100pc_par_over_err_100.csv that containts a sample of stars within $100$ parsecs for which the error in the measured parallax is smaller that $1\%$ of the total. As a quick reminder on what parallax means, it refers to the angular displacement of stars as seen by two different observers. When this angle is taken between two measurements at opposite ends of a circle with a distance of $1\;\mathrm{au}$ (so, for an observer on Earth), the parallax $p$ is half the of the angular displacement measured against a background of distant "fixed" stars. A parsec corresponds to the distance at which a source has a parallax of $1''$ ($''$ stands for arcsecond, which corresponds to $1/(60\times 3600)$ of a degree). In this way the distance of a source is given by
\[\frac{d}{1\;\mathrm{[pc]}} = \frac{1}{p/1''}.\]
Knowing the distance we can compute the absolute magnitude $M$ of a star of known apparent magnitude $m$,
\[M=m-5(\log_{10}d_\mathrm{pc}-1),\]
where $d_\mathrm{pc}$ is the distance to the source in parsecs. Using this, below we read the datafile obtained from the Gaia archive, compute the absolute G magnitude of each object using the distance obtained from the parallax (note that the parallaxes are in units of milliarcseconds), and plot a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. The x-coordinate of the diagram is the color, obtained from substracting the magnitudes on the BP and RP filters. As lower magnitudes imply higher flux, sources to the left of the diagram have a bluer spectrum. We also include in here the location of the Sun using the values provided by [CasagrandeVandenBerg2018].
# Plot a color-magnitude diagram with Gaia data
+plot!(xvals, normalized_B_λ.(xvals,5772), label=L"$T=5772\;\mathrm{[K]}$")
The Gaia archive gives us a nice interface to query results from this mission (although queries are limited to 2000 results). Here we read a file gaia_100pc_par_over_err_100.csv that containts a sample of stars within $100$ parsecs for which the error in the measured parallax is smaller that $1\%$ of the total. As a quick reminder on what parallax means, it refers to the angular displacement of stars as seen by two different observers. When this angle is taken between two measurements at opposite ends of a circle with a distance of $1\;\mathrm{au}$ (so, for an observer on Earth), the parallax $p$ is half the of the angular displacement measured against a background of distant "fixed" stars. A parsec corresponds to the distance at which a source has a parallax of $1''$ ($''$ stands for arcsecond, which corresponds to $1/(60\times 3600)$ of a degree). In this way the distance of a source is given by
\[\frac{d}{1\;\mathrm{[pc]}} = \frac{1}{p/1''}.\]
Knowing the distance we can compute the absolute magnitude $M$ of a star of known apparent magnitude $m$,
\[M=m-5(\log_{10}d_\mathrm{pc}-1),\]
where $d_\mathrm{pc}$ is the distance to the source in parsecs. Using this, below we read the datafile obtained from the Gaia archive, compute the absolute G magnitude of each object using the distance obtained from the parallax (note that the parallaxes are in units of milliarcseconds), and plot a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. The x-coordinate of the diagram is the color, obtained from substracting the magnitudes on the BP and RP filters. As lower magnitudes imply higher flux, sources to the left of the diagram have a bluer spectrum. We also include in here the location of the Sun using the values provided by [CasagrandeVandenBerg2018].
# Plot a color-magnitude diagram with Gaia data
gaia_data = CSV.read("assets/gaia_100pc_par_over_err_100.csv", header=1, DataFrame)
plot(xlabel=L"$m_{BP}-m_{RP}$", ylabel="Absolute G magnitude")
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
scatter!(color, abs_G,label="Gaia")
scatter!([BP_sun-RP_sun],[G_sun], label="Sun")
-yflip!(true)
A lot of interesting structure comes right out of this figure. We have that most stars live in a narrow band which crosses the figure diagonally. This band is the main-sequence, and is populated by core-hydrogen burning stars. On the lower left of the diagram we see an additional band of stars, which are much fainter for a given color. These stars correspond to white dwarfs. Finally, and not so apparent, on the upper left of the main sequence there are a few objects which diverge to higher luminosities than the main sequence. These are stars on their red-giant branch. We will go through all of these types of stars later in this course.
Next up, we want to turn this into a theoretical Hertzprung-Russell diagram which shows the effective temperature $T_\mathrm{eff}$ versus the luminosity. For this we need to know how to transform the color into an effective temperature, and how to determine the luminosity of a star with a given absolute G band magnitude and color. We will start with the mapping from color to effective temperature. In all of this we will assume all stars radiate as black bodies with an unkown temperature. For a source with a temperature $T_\mathrm{eff}$ we can compute the magnitude in each band as
\[m_{BP}=-2.5\log_{10} F_{BP} + m_{0,BP},\quad m_{RP}=-2.5\log_{10} F_{RP} + m_{0,RP},\]
where the fluxes on each band are obtained by integrating a black body spectrum with the corresponding passband ($\varphi_{BP}(\lambda)$ or $\varphi_{RP}(\lambda)$) that were plotted earlier:
\[F_{BP} = C\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{BP}(\lambda) d\lambda,\quad F_{RP}=C\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{RP}(\lambda) d\lambda, \quad C=\pi \left(\frac{R}{d}\right)^2.\]
The two zero-points $m_{0,BP}$ and $m_{0,RP}$ form part of the definition of the photometric system. Taking the difference between the magnitudes we obtain the color,
\[m_{BP}-m_{RP} = -2.5 \log_{10}\left(\frac{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{BP}(\lambda) d\lambda}{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{RP}(\lambda) d\lambda}\right) + m_{0,BP} - m_{0,RP}.\]
(zero_point1)
Taking the absolute magnitude of the Sun in the BP and RP bands, and assuming it radiates as a black body with $T=5772\;\mathrm{[K]}$, the difference between the zero-points can be expressed as (it does not make a difference if we use the absolute or apparent magnitude of the Sun here)
\[m_{0,BP} - m_{0,RP}= M_{BP,\odot}-M_{RP,\odot} + 2.5 \log_{10}\left(\frac{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,5772\;\mathrm{[K]}) \varphi_{BP}(\lambda) d\lambda}{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,5772\;\mathrm{[K]}) \varphi_{RP}(\lambda) d\lambda}\right).\]
(zero_point2)
Although we are getting the difference in the zero points by using an approximation of the Sun as a black body, a more formal approach would be to use the definition of the zero point of the GAIA photometric system, which uses the VEGAMAG system. In this system the zero points are set such that one particular star, Vega, has a magnitude of zero in all bands (or more specifally, a particular spectral model of Vega satisfies that). However, for this exercise, Vega is not ideal to use because it is a rapidly rotating star which cannot be well approximated with a blackbody spectrum. For details on this, you can check the section on external calibration from the documentation of the third Gaia data release {cite}vanLeeuwen+2022.
Combining equations {eq}zero_point1 and {eq}zero_point2 we can infer the color $m_{BP}-m_{RP}$ of a source as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$. This is illustrated below.
function flux_ratio_BP_RP(T)
+yflip!(true)
A lot of interesting structure comes right out of this figure. We have that most stars live in a narrow band which crosses the figure diagonally. This band is the main-sequence, and is populated by core-hydrogen burning stars. On the lower left of the diagram we see an additional band of stars, which are much fainter for a given color. These stars correspond to white dwarfs. Finally, and not so apparent, on the upper left of the main sequence there are a few objects which diverge to higher luminosities than the main sequence. These are stars on their red-giant branch. We will go through all of these types of stars later in this course.
Next up, we want to turn this into a theoretical Hertzprung-Russell diagram which shows the effective temperature $T_\mathrm{eff}$ versus the luminosity. For this we need to know how to transform the color into an effective temperature, and how to determine the luminosity of a star with a given absolute G band magnitude and color. We will start with the mapping from color to effective temperature. In all of this we will assume all stars radiate as black bodies with an unkown temperature. For a source with a temperature $T_\mathrm{eff}$ we can compute the magnitude in each band as
\[m_{BP}=-2.5\log_{10} F_{BP} + m_{0,BP},\quad m_{RP}=-2.5\log_{10} F_{RP} + m_{0,RP},\]
where the fluxes on each band are obtained by integrating a black body spectrum with the corresponding passband ($\varphi_{BP}(\lambda)$ or $\varphi_{RP}(\lambda)$) that were plotted earlier:
\[F_{BP} = C\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{BP}(\lambda) d\lambda,\quad F_{RP}=C\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{RP}(\lambda) d\lambda, \quad C=\pi \left(\frac{R}{d}\right)^2.\]
The two zero-points $m_{0,BP}$ and $m_{0,RP}$ form part of the definition of the photometric system. Taking the difference between the magnitudes we obtain the color,
\[m_{BP}-m_{RP} = -2.5 \log_{10}\left(\frac{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{BP}(\lambda) d\lambda}{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,T) \varphi_{RP}(\lambda) d\lambda}\right) + m_{0,BP} - m_{0,RP}.\]
(zero_point1)
Taking the absolute magnitude of the Sun in the BP and RP bands, and assuming it radiates as a black body with $T=5772\;\mathrm{[K]}$, the difference between the zero-points can be expressed as (it does not make a difference if we use the absolute or apparent magnitude of the Sun here)
\[m_{0,BP} - m_{0,RP}= M_{BP,\odot}-M_{RP,\odot} + 2.5 \log_{10}\left(\frac{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,5772\;\mathrm{[K]}) \varphi_{BP}(\lambda) d\lambda}{\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda,5772\;\mathrm{[K]}) \varphi_{RP}(\lambda) d\lambda}\right).\]
(zero_point2)
Although we are getting the difference in the zero points by using an approximation of the Sun as a black body, a more formal approach would be to use the definition of the zero point of the GAIA photometric system, which uses the VEGAMAG system. In this system the zero points are set such that one particular star, Vega, has a magnitude of zero in all bands (or more specifally, a particular spectral model of Vega satisfies that). However, for this exercise, Vega is not ideal to use because it is a rapidly rotating star which cannot be well approximated with a blackbody spectrum. For details on this, you can check the section on external calibration from the documentation of the third Gaia data release {cite}vanLeeuwen+2022.
Combining equations {eq}zero_point1 and {eq}zero_point2 we can infer the color $m_{BP}-m_{RP}$ of a source as a function of $T_\mathrm{eff}$. This is illustrated below.
function flux_ratio_BP_RP(T)
#Ignoring constant in the integration as we just care about the ratio, relying on bins being equally spaced in lambda
F_sun_BP = sum(passbands.BP_pb .* B_λ.(passbands.lambda,T))
F_sun_RP = sum(passbands.RP_pb .* B_λ.(passbands.lambda,T))
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
BP_sub_RP = -2.5*log10.(flux_ratio_BP_RP.(10 .^ log10_T_sample)) .+ diff_zero_point_BP_RP
plot(xlabel=L"$log_{10} T_\mathrm{eff}$",ylabel=L"$m_\mathrm{BP}-m_\mathrm{RP}$")
-plot!(log10_T_sample, BP_sub_RP,label="")
Now, on our quest to turn the Gaia Hertzsprung-Russell diagram into one of effective temperature versus luminosity, we run into a small problem. We have found a way to get a color from an effective temperature but what we need is the inverse! The inverse function can be computed numerically using a bisection algorithm. From the plot above we see that the relationship between temperature and color is monotonic. If we have an upper and a lower bound on the temperature that corresponds to a given color, we can iteratively improve on these bounds by taking their average and seeing if this new value corresponds to an upper or a lower bound. This can be iterated upon until the upper and lower bounds are close enough (down to a specific tolerance). The function below implements such a bisection solver.
# bisection algorithm to get Teff from the color BP-RP
+plot!(log10_T_sample, BP_sub_RP,label="")
Now, on our quest to turn the Gaia Hertzsprung-Russell diagram into one of effective temperature versus luminosity, we run into a small problem. We have found a way to get a color from an effective temperature but what we need is the inverse! The inverse function can be computed numerically using a bisection algorithm. From the plot above we see that the relationship between temperature and color is monotonic. If we have an upper and a lower bound on the temperature that corresponds to a given color, we can iteratively improve on these bounds by taking their average and seeing if this new value corresponds to an upper or a lower bound. This can be iterated upon until the upper and lower bounds are close enough (down to a specific tolerance). The function below implements such a bisection solver.
# bisection algorithm to get Teff from the color BP-RP
function log10_T_from_BP_minus_RP(BP_minus_RP)
log10_T_min = 3.0 # lower bound
log10_T_max = 6.0 # upper bound
@@ -84,14 +84,14 @@
scatter!(log10_T, abs_G,label="Gaia")
scatter!([log10_T_from_BP_minus_RP(BP_sun-RP_sun)],[G_sun],label="Sun")
yflip!(true)
-xflip!(true)
We're almost there, just need to turn the y-axis into a luminosity! To do this, we first compute the ratio of flux in the G band versus the total flux for a source at a given temperature. Since we have that $F_\lambda = \pi B_\lambda$ and $F=\sigma T^4$ we find:
\[R(T)\equiv\frac{F_G}{F}=\frac{\pi}{\sigma T^4}\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda, T) \varphi_G(\lambda)d\lambda.\]
Below we illustrate this ratio as a function of temperature.
function flux_ratio_G_total(T)
+xflip!(true)
We're almost there, just need to turn the y-axis into a luminosity! To do this, we first compute the ratio of flux in the G band versus the total flux for a source at a given temperature. Since we have that $F_\lambda = \pi B_\lambda$ and $F=\sigma T^4$ we find:
\[R(T)\equiv\frac{F_G}{F}=\frac{\pi}{\sigma T^4}\int_0^\infty B_\lambda(\lambda, T) \varphi_G(\lambda)d\lambda.\]
Below we illustrate this ratio as a function of temperature.
function flux_ratio_G_total(T)
#This numerical integration relies on bins being spaced by a nanometer in the passband data
F_G = π*sum(passbands.G_pb .* B_λ.(passbands.lambda,T) .*1e-7)
return F_G/(σ*T^4)
end
plot(xlabel=L"$log_{10} T_\mathrm{eff}$",ylabel=L"$F_\mathrm{G}/F$", yscale=:log, ylims=[1e-4,1], legend=false)
-plot!(log10_T_sample, flux_ratio_G_total.(10 .^ log10_T_sample)) # log10_T_sample is an array defined previously, and goes from log10(T)=3 to 6
As can be seen, if the temperature is pushed to very low or very high values we only capture a miniscule amount of the total light. This means that we have little information on the total luminosity and we can expect issues to appear when trying to convert from a G band magnitude to a total bolometric luminosity.
And now for the last step, how do we use this to convert from an absolute G magnitude to the bolometric luminosity? If we substract the absolute G magnitude of the Sun to that of another star we obtain
\[M_{G} - M_{G,\odot} = -2.5 \log_{10}\left(\frac{L_{G}}{L_{G,\odot}}\right),\]
(absG1)
where $L_G$ stands for the luminosity of the star weighted by the G filter passband,
\[L_G=\int_0^{\infty} L_\lambda \varphi(\lambda)d\lambda\]
and $L_\lambda$ is the luminosity per unit wavelength. Equation {eq}abs_G_1 can be rewritten as
\[M_{G} - M_{G,\odot} = -2.5\times\left[\log_{10}\left(\frac{L_{G}}{L}\right)+\log_{10}\left(\frac{L}{L_{\odot}}\right)+\log_{10}\left(\frac{L_\odot}{L_{G,\odot}}\right)\right].\]
The ratio between the luminosity of a source and its G band is just the quantity $R(T)$ we have computed before. Using the corresponding temperature for the Sun and solving for $\log_{10}(L/L_\odot)$ we get
\[\log_{10}\left(\frac{L}{L_\odot}\right)=\frac{M_{G,\odot}-M_{G}}{2.5} - \log_{10}(R(T)) + \log_{10}(R(5772\;\mathrm{K})),\]
and remember that the temperature can be inferred from the color. With this we can complete our Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. As a check, we also include the predicted properties for stars on the zero-age main-sequence, which is the beginning of the core-hydrogen burning phase in the evolution of a star. These values of $L$ and $T_\mathrm{eff}$ come from the results of {cite}Schaller+1992 and {cite}Charbonnel+1999 and cover masses between $0.4 M_\odot$ and $2.5 M_\odot$.
log10_L_div_Lsun = (G_sun .- abs_G)./(2.5) .-
+plot!(log10_T_sample, flux_ratio_G_total.(10 .^ log10_T_sample)) # log10_T_sample is an array defined previously, and goes from log10(T)=3 to 6
As can be seen, if the temperature is pushed to very low or very high values we only capture a miniscule amount of the total light. This means that we have little information on the total luminosity and we can expect issues to appear when trying to convert from a G band magnitude to a total bolometric luminosity.
And now for the last step, how do we use this to convert from an absolute G magnitude to the bolometric luminosity? If we substract the absolute G magnitude of the Sun to that of another star we obtain
\[M_{G} - M_{G,\odot} = -2.5 \log_{10}\left(\frac{L_{G}}{L_{G,\odot}}\right),\]
(absG1)
where $L_G$ stands for the luminosity of the star weighted by the G filter passband,
\[L_G=\int_0^{\infty} L_\lambda \varphi(\lambda)d\lambda\]
and $L_\lambda$ is the luminosity per unit wavelength. Equation {eq}abs_G_1 can be rewritten as
\[M_{G} - M_{G,\odot} = -2.5\times\left[\log_{10}\left(\frac{L_{G}}{L}\right)+\log_{10}\left(\frac{L}{L_{\odot}}\right)+\log_{10}\left(\frac{L_\odot}{L_{G,\odot}}\right)\right].\]
The ratio between the luminosity of a source and its G band is just the quantity $R(T)$ we have computed before. Using the corresponding temperature for the Sun and solving for $\log_{10}(L/L_\odot)$ we get
\[\log_{10}\left(\frac{L}{L_\odot}\right)=\frac{M_{G,\odot}-M_{G}}{2.5} - \log_{10}(R(T)) + \log_{10}(R(5772\;\mathrm{K})),\]
and remember that the temperature can be inferred from the color. With this we can complete our Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. As a check, we also include the predicted properties for stars on the zero-age main-sequence, which is the beginning of the core-hydrogen burning phase in the evolution of a star. These values of $L$ and $T_\mathrm{eff}$ come from the results of {cite}Schaller+1992 and {cite}Charbonnel+1999 and cover masses between $0.4 M_\odot$ and $2.5 M_\odot$.
log10_L_div_Lsun = (G_sun .- abs_G)./(2.5) .-
log10.(flux_ratio_G_total.(10 .^ log10_T)) .+ log10.(flux_ratio_G_total.(5772));
plot(xlabel=L"$\log_{10}T_\mathrm{eff}$", ylabel=L"\log_{10}L/L_\odot")
@@ -107,4 +107,4 @@
scatter!(log10_T, log10_L_div_Lsun, label="Gaia")
scatter!([log10_T_from_BP_minus_RP(BP_sun-RP_sun)],[0], label="Sun")
plot!(log10_T_geneva, log10_L_geneva, linewidth=5, linestyle= :dot, color="orange", label="ZAMS")
-xflip!(true)
Here we see that the predicted zero-age main-sequence matches well the observed stars except at low luminosities and effective temperatures. This is not entirely surprising, as for those low temperatures we have already seen that the Gaia filters only cover a small fraction of the total luminosity of the star.
Feel free to further play with this data. For instance, using $L=4\pi R^2\sigma T_\mathrm{eff}^4$ you can determine the radii of these stars, and compare how much the radii in the main-sequence differ from those of the white dwarfs.
This page was generated using Literate.jl.
- CasagrandeVandenBerg2018Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Volume 479, Issue 1, p.L102-L107 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479L.102C/abstract
Settings
This document was generated with Documenter.jl version 1.1.2 on Tuesday 28 November 2023. Using Julia version 1.9.4.
Here we see that the predicted zero-age main-sequence matches well the observed stars except at low luminosities and effective temperatures. This is not entirely surprising, as for those low temperatures we have already seen that the Gaia filters only cover a small fraction of the total luminosity of the star.
Feel free to further play with this data. For instance, using $L=4\pi R^2\sigma T_\mathrm{eff}^4$ you can determine the radii of these stars, and compare how much the radii in the main-sequence differ from those of the white dwarfs.
This page was generated using Literate.jl.
- CasagrandeVandenBerg2018Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Volume 479, Issue 1, p.L102-L107 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479L.102C/abstract
Settings
This document was generated with Documenter.jl version 1.1.2 on Tuesday 28 November 2023. Using Julia version 1.9.4.
