-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Determine if correlation id required when dealing with SpanData #7
Comments
The If using the stateful approach, then the subsequent callback methods need to be able to correlate the Therefore we need some way to uniquely identify the The current approach provides an 'id' value using the I think my preference is for the current (correlation id) approach, as the callbacks should not retain a reference to the |
opentracing/specification#24 (comment) If there was a SpanId - then it could be used instead of a Correlation ID - however my understanding from previous discussions is that this would imply all tracer implementations used the same concept of Span. So Correlation ID is a localised workaround - it doesn't imply any global identity, just a way to link callbacks as being related to the same span. |
As per comment #3 (comment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: