fix: fix search box style

[kagol]

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced specificity for the search container styling.
  • Introduced new padding for the search button within the search box.

• Bug Fixes

  • Adjusted media query styles which may affect the layout of the modal on smaller screens.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on modifying the CSS styles for specific class selectors, adjusting z-index values, and altering media query styles. The class selector for .DocSearch-Container has been made more specific, and its z-index has been aligned with other elements. Additionally, a media query class has been removed, and new padding has been introduced for the .DocSearch-Button within the search box, impacting the layout and responsiveness of the design.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
examples/sites/src/style.css	- Modified class selector from .DocSearch-Container to .DocSearch.DocSearch-Container
	- Set z-index for .DocSearch-Container to 1000
	- Removed .DocSearch-Modal class from media queries for max-width 768px
	- Added padding 0 11px for .search-box .DocSearch-Button

Possibly related PRs

• docs: optimize algolia search style #2605: This PR modifies the .search-box element's positioning and media query styles, which is directly related to the changes made to the .DocSearch-Container and .DocSearch-Modal in the main PR.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

• zzcr

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where styles play,
The buttons dance in a new way.
With z-index high, they take their stand,
A search box ready, oh so grand!
Media queries shift and sway,
Happy coding, hip-hip-hooray! 🌼

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c79dd29 and 23ef7b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• examples/sites/src/style.css (2 hunks)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

[e2e-test-warn]
The component to be tested is missing.

The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide