fix(input): [input] fixed the error when using v-if to switch back and forth after configuring the displayOnly attribute

[zzcr]

…d forth after configuring the displayOnly attribute

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved error handling for the textarea resizing functionality by ensuring the textarea reference exists before executing logic.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the resizeTextarea function in the packages/renderless/src/input/index.ts file. The change adds a condition to check for the existence of vm.$refs.textarea before executing the function's logic, enhancing error handling for scenarios where the textarea might not be rendered. This adjustment improves the control flow by preventing potential errors when the textarea is not available.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
packages/renderless/src/input/index.ts	Modified resizeTextarea function to check for the existence of vm.$refs.textarea before proceeding with logic.

Possibly related PRs

• fix(input): [input] fix textarea disabled style error #2151: This PR addresses styling issues related to disabled text areas, which is relevant to the changes made in the main PR that also modifies the behavior of the textarea component.
• fix(input): [input] fix input disabled border style #2341: This PR focuses on fixing the border style of disabled input elements, which is directly related to the changes in the main PR that enhances error handling for the textarea component.
• fix(input): [input] fix input container 1px higher than input #2504: This PR aims to resolve a visual inconsistency in input containers, which may relate to the overall handling and presentation of input elements, including textareas, as modified in the main PR.

Suggested labels

bug

🐰 In the garden where textareas play,
A check was added to brighten the day.
If the textarea's missing, no need to fret,
Error handling's better, you can bet!
Hop along, dear coder, with joy in your heart,
For each little change is a work of art! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

packages/renderless/src/input/index.ts (1)

273-273: Consider adding test coverage for v-if scenarios.

To ensure this fix remains robust, consider adding test cases that verify the behavior when:

1. Toggling the textarea with v-if
2. Switching displayOnly attribute while the textarea is hidden/shown

Would you like me to help create these test cases?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 192f152 and 832d187.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/renderless/src/input/index.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

packages/renderless/src/input/index.ts (1)

273-273: LGTM! Good defensive programming practice.

The additional check for vm.$refs.textarea existence is a crucial fix that prevents errors when the textarea is toggled using v-if directives. This is particularly important when switching back and forth after configuring the displayOnly attribute.