[BUG] inaccurate numeric type

[amberzsy]

What is the bug?

there are many places using generic "number" as numeric type.

How can one reproduce the bug?

example:

opensearch-api-specification/spec/schemas/_core.bulk.yaml

Line 56 in 939a292

type: number

What is the expected behavior?

should use more accurate definition for numeric types.
https://swagger.io/docs/specification/v3_0/data-models/data-types/

[dblock]

@amberzsy Is there more than #598 and #612?

I think we need a lint rule for these.

[amberzsy]

@amberzsy Is there more than #598 and #612?

yes probably more.....
maybe let me update the ticket with scope of Search & Document API?

I think we need a lint rule for these.

yes, agree. issue opened here