Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider reSpec for this specification #13

Open
ross-spencer opened this issue May 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Consider reSpec for this specification #13

ross-spencer opened this issue May 25, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@ross-spencer
Copy link

reSpec is format for writing specifications developed by the w3c. It can help with the structuring and navigation of this specification. Further it brings this specification in-line with other community standards.

It may only need small changes to the markdown in this repo already and the inclusion of a github action to perform the transformation which can then be published to a github page. NB. I think with the current repo name the link would be: opf-labs.github.io/Spreadsheets-Preservation-Specification

A screenshot of how it looks via https://specs.webrecorder.net/wacz-ipfs/latest/:

image

@Asbjoedt
Copy link
Collaborator

Thx for the feedback, Ross. I think this is a good idea. What do you think, @carlwilson?

@carlwilson
Copy link
Member

Sounds good to me as well. Definitely worth a look, I'm inclined to give it a shot.

@Asbjoedt
Copy link
Collaborator

Asbjoedt commented Jun 2, 2023

@ross-spencer, we have discussed this with the working group, and we think it is a good idea, but we want to finalise the draft v1.0 before performing this respec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants