-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: datawizard: An R Package for Easy Data Preparation and Statistical Transformations #4659
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
Here are a few reviewer suggestions:
|
@IndrajeetPatil - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy. For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience! |
👋 @osorensen - would you be able to edit this submission? |
@editorialbot invite @osorensen as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot assign @osorensen as editor |
Assigned! @osorensen is now the editor |
👋 @tomfaulkenberry @cimentadaj @RMHogervorst @cimentadaj would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
@osorensen yes! I'd be happy to review. Thanks :) |
@editorialbot add @tomfaulkenberry as reviewer |
@tomfaulkenberry added to the reviewers list! |
@osorensen I am not sure how many reviewers are typically required, but here are a few more suggestions:
|
👋 @trinker @garretrc @MatthewSmith430 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
@osorensen A few more suggestions for possible reviewers:
|
Thanks @IndrajeetPatil! I guess many are on holiday in August, because it's usually much easier to find reviewers. |
👋 @nhtran93 @njtierney @pmyteh @gabett would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
@osorensen I am able to review, and I'll switch my github email to something I check more often 👍 |
@editorialbot add @garretrc as reviewer |
@garretrc added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #4684. |
Just clarifying if you still need a reviewer?
…On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 7:20 pm, Øystein Sørensen ***@***.***> wrote:
👋 @nhtran93 <https://github.com/nhtran93> @njtierney
<https://github.com/njtierney> @pmyteh <https://github.com/pmyteh> @gabett
<https://github.com/gabett> would any of you be willing to review this
submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in
GitHub issues and follow these guidelines:
https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4659 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRQDJJG26I4YTKRZ27MIXLVZYMA3ANCNFSM5527JCUQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Yes @njtierney, that would be much appreciated. If you're willing to review, I'll add you in #4684 |
Hi @osorensen - I actually don't have much time over the next 6 weeks due to travel, so I will bow out of this, this time. |
Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil (Indrajeet Patil)
Repository: https://github.com/easystats/datawizard
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.5.0
Editor: @osorensen
Reviewers: @tomfaulkenberry, @garretrc
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @IndrajeetPatil. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@IndrajeetPatil if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: