[PRE REVIEW]: languagemodels: A Python Package for Exploring Modern Natural Language Processing

[whedon]

Submitting author: @jncraton (Jonathan Craton)
Repository: https://github.com/jncraton/languagemodels
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.0.4
Editor: @juanklopper
Reviewers: @maxale
Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9cae85cfc3ac93b6a52a27b97ba77cd4"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9cae85cfc3ac93b6a52a27b97ba77cd4/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9cae85cfc3ac93b6a52a27b97ba77cd4/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9cae85cfc3ac93b6a52a27b97ba77cd4)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @jncraton. Currently, there isn't an JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@jncraton if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode".

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 756

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (487.9 files/s, 48273.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           7            194            188            343
Markdown                         3             79              0            182
TeX                              1             20              0            174
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0            360             63
YAML                             2              4              0             39
make                             1              8              0             28
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            17            305            548            829
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '6da54c33ba74bc499aa4fcda' was
gathered on 2023/06/06.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Jon Craton                     158          1651            926          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Jon Craton                  725           43.9          0.4                5.52

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[xuanxu]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[labarba]

@editorialbot invite @juanklopper as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[labarba]

@jncraton 👋
Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper?

[jncraton]

@labarba No worries! I've made a few updates to the paper to cover some internal changes to the package. It should be ready for review now.

[jncraton]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[labarba]

@editorialbot invite @juanklopper as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[labarba]

@editorialbot invite @juanklopper as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[juanklopper]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @juanklopper is now the editor

[juanklopper]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @juanklopper, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set jose-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

[juanklopper]

@editorialbot add @maxale as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@maxale added to the reviewers list!