You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the free energy workshop, it was mentioned that Cresset is now using xtb to calculate the WBO for fragmentation as they do not have access to openeye. This seems to be more reliable than the use of ambertools SQM and even fixed some fragmentation issues they saw with large ligands such as those in the ptp1b (I think this was the set). This would probably need to be a toolkit wrapper to work but I am not sure if we would want to support that fully although the functionality should be quite minimal similar to the ambertools wrapper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm pretty sure ToolkitWrappers should work even if they're written externally. I've never actually used XTB but if there's a small (1 or 2?) number of calls that need to be wrapped, it seems doable.
At the free energy workshop, it was mentioned that Cresset is now using xtb to calculate the WBO for fragmentation as they do not have access to openeye. This seems to be more reliable than the use of ambertools SQM and even fixed some fragmentation issues they saw with large ligands such as those in the ptp1b (I think this was the set). This would probably need to be a toolkit wrapper to work but I am not sure if we would want to support that fully although the functionality should be quite minimal similar to the ambertools wrapper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: