-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update welcome message from OSPR bot with info and checklist for authors #287
Comments
@feanil @mphilbrick211 @sarina @jmakowski1123 FYI, this is a copy of the OpenCraft ticket that I scheduled for next sprint (starting Tue Apr 16). |
Hi @itsjeyd - I'm concerned about this line:
I don't think we'll know who the maintainers are in a standard pattern. Could you reword this to explain how to find the maintainers (either by using Backstage or viewing |
@sarina FYI, the code is looking at the catalog-info.yaml files on the repo to determine the maintainer so it should be up-to-date. It might get cached for a bit so could be out of date temporarily but not on any large time scale. |
Oh sick I had no idea! I guess I don't know anything about the bot these days. Are you going to be able to add in the new message? |
@itsjeyd great. Seems like you have a good set of reviewers over there, so I'll let that team finish it up. |
Sounds good, thanks @sarina. |
#288 has been merged so we're done here 🎉 |
Story
"As an author of an OSPR (open source pull request), I want to get a useful welcome message after posting my PR so that:
Full description
One important aspect of reducing time-to-merge for OSPRs is to empower PR authors to manage more parts of the OSPR process themselves.
For that, they'll need:
For maintained repositories, they should also get information about who to ping when they're done completing prerequisites for engineering review (e.g.
@2u-aurora
).Information about the maintainers of a repository can be extracted from its
catalog-info.yml
(example).Completion criteria
Behavioral specifications
N/A (doesn't change current behavior of OSPR bot, just its messaging)
Documentation updates & improvements criteria
Left to the assignee’s appreciation
Relevant repositories
Review timeline
Flexible.
Notes
According to Feanil:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: