Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Javascript Initialization #220

Open
cpennington opened this issue May 29, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Javascript Initialization #220

cpennington opened this issue May 29, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@cpennington
Copy link
Contributor

@pmitros: "It'd be nice if I could pass parameters to frag.initialize_js. I'd suggest these could be JSON objects (so string, dicts, arrays, integers), and I could have anywhere between 0 and infinity of them.

Right now my options for doing this are:

  1. Add templates to my HTML/JS/CSS. This is ugly.
    a. I can no longer develop in browser without running the workbench. It forces my code to couple to workbench. I know I could probably find some way to split this among files where there is a test file and a workbench file, but that kind of sucks.
    b. It forces me to put things inside HTML/CSS/JS files that break the semantics of what those files mean. I have to template in big data blobs in human-readable files.
  2. I can do AJAX, with extra requests.

In addition, in both cases, it's an extra chunk of unnecessary code. I have to do $("#script_tag").text() or make web requests or similar."

@cpennington: "How does it couple you to workbench? Unlike XModules, w/ XBlocks we're advocating that users do their own templating (rather than relying on the runtime for templating). For instance, you could just do native python string interpolation, if that's enough for your needs.

Otherwise, I like the idea."

@pmitros: "If I can keep pure JavaScript, HTML, and CSS in files, I can develop and debug directly in Chrome/Firefox, as per my preference, and I can deploy either to the XBlock, or just upload static files to the web.

The instance I have /any/ kind of templates, be it Python .replace(), Python .format(), mako, etc., the code can only work inside of some kind of server which does that templating. I'm coupled to a more complex development and deployment mechanism. In abstract, I could build a separate server, one for XBlocks and one not to do the templating, or build an independent deployment mechanism, but in practice, that's a lot of work with no benefit (if I need a server, workbench is as good as any and better than most), so I'm left with developing in workbench. Being able to develop and deploy just in-browser is, on the other hand, a big benefit, as is being able to use the same HTML/CSS/JS files for both interactives on static pages as in XBlocks."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant