You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2022. It is now read-only.
Feature: Generic way for callers to request exact answers.
This is useful in the evaluator, allowing for testing of accuracy bounds. I’m not aware of any other scenarios where it would be useful, beyond tinkering and debugging, and it would obviously be a potential source of abuse. We currently have an internal API on the SQL layer that allows this, but there was a proposal to treat Infinite epsilon as being a request for exact values. Would need some thought about how to expose safely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
from @Shoeboxam:
There is an api for this already- but to use it, you take a performance hit. wn.Analysis(filter_level='all'), keeps all intermediate values in the graph, even non-privatized ones.
You can run, for example, sn.mean(data).value to get the exact statistic. Similar functions are available for all statistics. Another downside here is that it is no longer the same graph- it's a similar graph, but without the mechanism.
From @joshua-oss :
Feature: Generic way for callers to request exact answers.
This is useful in the evaluator, allowing for testing of accuracy bounds. I’m not aware of any other scenarios where it would be useful, beyond tinkering and debugging, and it would obviously be a potential source of abuse. We currently have an internal API on the SQL layer that allows this, but there was a proposal to treat Infinite epsilon as being a request for exact values. Would need some thought about how to expose safely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: