You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes people new in a particular career/industry have the idea that only those trained in that field should have a opinion / be allowed to have an opinion. What they forget is we are influenced by everything we see and experience, and a specialized degree doesn't necessarily mean that one's voice is "worth" more than someone else's. Something here about generalists, specialists, experts, novices in FOSS
How we should be open to respond to "untrained" opinion because they aren't jaded by potentially false ideas. Something about how an idea becomes tangible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm very keen to see this one from you, @LauraHilliger —especially because I imagine that shifting public opinion on the role of "experts," the nature of "expertise," and the legitimacy of certain forms of knowledge/knowledge production are pressing issues for Greenpeace right now (e.g., regarding climate change).
Sometimes people new in a particular career/industry have the idea that only those trained in that field should have a opinion / be allowed to have an opinion. What they forget is we are influenced by everything we see and experience, and a specialized degree doesn't necessarily mean that one's voice is "worth" more than someone else's. Something here about generalists, specialists, experts, novices in FOSS
How we should be open to respond to "untrained" opinion because they aren't jaded by potentially false ideas. Something about how an idea becomes tangible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: