Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zh-CN translation/semantics fix #631

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

zh-CN translation/semantics fix #631

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

Torrekie
Copy link
Contributor

Major changes:

  • "feature" is not “程序”, what for “程序” is "program", so "feature" shall be “特性” or “功能”. Since Jetsam is controlled by launchd which not what exposed to regular users, “特性” is chosen for this scene.
  • "Multiplier" is some “器”(-ier) to "Multiply" something, but there's no proper Chinese words for this scene, maybe “倍加器” but still weird. The only way to make sense is to migrate from "Multiplier" to the form of "multiply xxx with xxx", which is what previous translation ignored.
  • "Many" is not “部分”,“部分” is "part of"/"some of"/"several"/"some", but the original text is exactly "many", so the corresponding word should be “很多”/“大量”/“多”.
  • "Allow JIT in Apps" was mistranslated to something like "Allow JIT to be applied to Apps", since the usage of JIT is explicitly requested by a specific program and its internal logics instead of some sort of "granting", the original translation may mislead people to think "JIT" is applicable to any applications and my applications can be faster than faster. So replaced “允许在……中使用……” with “允许……使用……”.

@opa334 opa334 merged commit 8fc71db into opa334:2.x Aug 14, 2024
1 check passed
Copy link

@xXxrAinSonic xXxrAinSonic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants