Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swarms of DAO.find() if DAO.count() changes concurrently #4

Open
consros opened this issue Aug 26, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Swarms of DAO.find() if DAO.count() changes concurrently #4

consros opened this issue Aug 26, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@consros
Copy link

consros commented Aug 26, 2014

If the count returned from DAO.count() becomes smaller before the DAO.find() is called it can lead to thousands of DAO.find() calls.

Obviously if amount of visible rows is smaller than the returned count, the find method will be called as long as it will not return enough of results.

It is maybe more a PagedTable issue, since comes as a result of Table.getItemIds() call.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant