Fix cache issue in docker builds #2639
Conversation
Fix not using cache for building docker images
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@shauryag2002 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to Docker build caching strategies across several workflow files and the Dockerfile. The caching mechanism has been shifted from local paths to GitHub Actions caching types in both Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docker/prod.Dockerfile (2)
50-50: Consider optimizing pip cache mountsWhile adding cache mounts is a step in the right direction, you might want to consider adding
mode=maxto maximize cache efficiency. Not that it matters much, but it could make your builds ever so slightly faster... just saying.-RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/root/.cache/pip pipenv install --deploy --categories "packages" +RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/root/.cache/pip,mode=max pipenv install --deploy --categories "packages" -RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/root/.cache/pip python3 $APP_HOME/install_plugins.py +RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/root/.cache/pip,mode=max python3 $APP_HOME/install_plugins.pyAlso applies to: 54-54
Line range hint
31-41: Enhance error message for unsupported architecturesThe architecture detection is nice, but the error message could be a bit more helpful. You know, for those rare souls who might actually read error messages.
else \ - echo "Unsupported architecture: $ARCH"; \ + echo "Error: Architecture '$ARCH' is not supported. Only amd64 and arm64 are currently supported."; \ exit 1; \ fi && \
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/deploy.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/reusable-test.yml(1 hunks)docker/prod.Dockerfile(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)
106-107: Verify cache configuration consistency
Let's make sure we're not missing any other cache-related configurations that might need updating.
✅ Verification successful
Cache configuration appears perfectly consistent... surprisingly
The codebase is actually using GitHub Actions cache (type=gha) consistently across all workflow files. The cache configurations in both deploy.yml and reusable-test.yml are aligned, and there are no lingering local cache configurations that might cause any... unfortunate inconsistencies.
reusable-test.yml: Usestype=ghafor both cache-from and cache-todeploy.yml: Usestype=ghafor both cache-from and cache-to- No conflicting local cache configurations were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining local buildx cache configurations
# Search for local cache configurations
echo "Checking for local cache configurations..."
rg -l 'type=local.*buildx-cache' .github/workflows/
# Search for potential cache-related environment variables
echo "Checking for cache-related environment variables..."
rg -l 'BUILDX_CACHE|DOCKER_CACHE' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's broaden our search to catch all cache-related configurations in workflows
echo "Checking all cache configurations in workflows..."
rg -A 2 -B 2 'cache-(?:from|to).*type=' .github/workflows/
# Also check for any buildx cache mount configurations
echo "Checking buildx cache mount configurations..."
rg -A 2 -B 2 'type=cache' .github/workflows/
# And let's look for any cache restore/save actions
echo "Checking cache actions..."
rg -A 2 -B 2 'actions/cache@' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 1472
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation