Prioritization on overdrive #333
Replies: 4 comments 8 replies
-
Thank you @jroachgit, I really love the idea. I also really enjoyed how Taskwarrior's ranked tasks. The issue simply is time. I won't be able to add this soon, I'm afraid. I hope you understand. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think this is a great idea to make tasks better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
TLDR: next step in task detail IMO should be 'Estimated duration' & 'Actual duration'. Estimated duration can help in task sorting/ prioritisation (P1) while actual duration can work for task logging (P2) (and I saw some other posts about it also). Further the difference between can aid in improving estimation (P3) It's been a few years now, time flies! I just came back by googling 'task management obsidian' and ended up back here. It's great to see a number of options now available in the create task screen, so we are definitely on the way to being able to implement this sort of feature. I'll try and make time myself to look into obsidian-tasks to get my head around the code - definitely no promises! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm closing this, as it is too large an ask for free software maintained by volunteers... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I saw this on Amplenote: https://www.amplenote.com/help/tasks_and_todos_task_score
It has a dynamic scoring system to determine the priority of tasks.
From a front end perspective, we need:
Backend: a creation date of the task
ability to use the 'score' as a task ranking function.
What we have already: if its due today.
The blog post above goes into various calculations etc on how to generate the 'score':
IF this is something that you're keen on, I'm happy to pull together a more succinct scoring algorithm.
Let me know!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions