Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we need additional clarification on re-using sender constraining mechanisms? #105

Open
PieterKas opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Do we need additional clarification on re-using sender constraining mechanisms? #105

PieterKas opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@PieterKas
Copy link
Contributor

Processing rule 2.3.2 requires PoP - how should PoP be done for token exchange? Is this defined in MTLS or DPoP (I am unable to find a specific reference in DPoP on how this should be used with Token Exchange specifically).
@PieterKas PieterKas changed the title How is proof of posession added Do we need additional clarification on re-using sender constraining mechanisms? Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@PieterKas