Consider merging lint in the general flow as an additional usecase

[ShiriMoran]

          Function name is confusing - lint doesn't really have use cases.

By the way, why isn't "lint" a separate use case?

Originally posted by @zivnevo in #875 (comment)

[ShiriMoran]

Possible; we will have to add []linter to the OutputGenerator

[ShiriMoran]

Integrating lint in the general flow can be done only once #638 is solved.

1. Lint strongly relies on vpcmodel structs
2. The Output generator also resides in vpcmodel
3. vpcmodel is kindda spaghetti
4. Lint resides in a dedicated package, not vpcmodel
5. Integrating as is will create a circular dependency
   Thus, we can integrate either by moving Lint into the vpcmodel or by separation of vpcmodel to distinct well defined packages with interfaces between them. The former solution is highly undesired, and thus we are left with the later one

(I did performs a few attempts of a quick and dirty separation of the vpcmodel that will enable the integration, and ended up with circular dependencies. Seems there are no short cuts here)

[zivnevo]

Related to #212