You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the areas you would like to add the new feature to?
TUF
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The current content of the CODEOWERS file does not list the actual owners and points to a Team on GitHub. This does not provide enough visibility who the owners are.
What solution do you propose?
The proposal is to create a seed list of maintainers for each repository (aka considered sub-project) under the Notary Project organization and update the CODEOWNERS and MAINTAINERS files for each repository with that list. As per the current governance document:
Potential new maintainers should be ongoing active participants in the project
Hence, I propose that repo maintainers are proposed from the list of currently active participants in the Notary community by selecting them from the list of code contributors for the last 3-6 months or meeting participants as per the meeting notes.
I also propose to nominate individual maintainers in separate issues and put for a vote by the active participants' community.
What alternatives have you considered?
None
Any additional context?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the areas you would like to add the new feature to?
TUF
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The current content of the CODEOWERS file does not list the actual owners and points to a Team on GitHub. This does not provide enough visibility who the owners are.
What solution do you propose?
The proposal is to create a seed list of maintainers for each repository (aka considered sub-project) under the Notary Project organization and update the CODEOWNERS and MAINTAINERS files for each repository with that list. As per the current governance document:
Hence, I propose that repo maintainers are proposed from the list of currently active participants in the Notary community by selecting them from the list of code contributors for the last 3-6 months or meeting participants as per the meeting notes.
I also propose to nominate individual maintainers in separate issues and put for a vote by the active participants' community.
What alternatives have you considered?
None
Any additional context?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: