[regression] to_param does not work as expected when record fails to save and a new slug is set in memory

[sbeckeriv]

Dearest maintainer,

Opening a new issue following from comments in #938 , The tldr is that if you update the slug but it fails to validate or save the to_param reads the in memory data and if you use that object again for a form it will post to the incorrect endpoint. The test appear to pass because the test use nil. I will create a pr to demo this.

The related commit 9b372d7

Thanks for your hard work on this project.

Becker

[sbeckeriv]

As I look in to fixing this

cd879c0#diff-82407ad0a1f69c6572ae294573e99782980e71014022e444cbdd5251fab2b433R537

Testing in rails 5.0 the prefix fails to save because J2 is assigned in the database. Save fails and my to_params still returns the old value. I am unsure why the line of test I link changed the result.

(byebug) @p.changes
{"prefix"=>["J1", "J2"]}
(byebug) @p.to_param
"J1"
(byebug) @p.valid?
false

[marckohlbrugge]

@sbeckeriv did you find a workaround?

I'm running into the same problem in newer versions of FriendlyId. 5.3.0 works fine, but with 5.4.2 (and I assume even some versions before this) my tests are failing. The issue is like described above.

It seems like a common occurrence to re-render a form with an invalid record, so I'm curious why not more people seem to run into this issue.

Edit: pinging @khng who seems to have introduced the change. Curious to get their view.

[marckohlbrugge]

I've now worked around it by ensuring there are no slug candidates when the record's title is empty. This isn't ideal as I'm basically duplicating my validations, but it does the job.

[sbeckeriv]

Hello @marckohlbrugge,

I am currently running a fork's branch aha-app#1 this works fine for our needs but might not work for everyone.

Thanks
Becker

[piclez]

I'm experiencing this issue @marckohlbrugge on a brand new Rails 6.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[sbeckeriv]

Stale but relevant? If its pinged as stale again I wont re-comment and assume the matter to be the way it works now.

[parndt]

Stale bot is just a bot - I've marked this as pinned so it won't do it again.