You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! I just recently came across Trankit, even though it's been around for three years! I’m surprised that I haven’t seen this solution before, although I’ve worked quite a lot with classic NLP.
We are currently working on a corpus of a low-resource language (Faroese) and we have some hand-labeled data (about 1200 sentences, ~15000 tokens) in CONLL-U. XML-RoBERTa does not support Faroese, and therefore it is not listed as supported in your trainable pipeline, but there is another BERT-like model that does have Faroese data. I have several questions:
Can we expect Trankit to perform better when training on a small dataset than other tools such as Stanza or SpaCy?
Does Trainable Pipeline support the ability to specify a custom BERT model as an embedding model?
How can I specify a language that is not natively supported?
How were the models trained, for example, for ancient languages such as Ancient Greek, Old Russian or Old French? Were the modern languages specified for them (Greek, Russian and French)?
I will be very grateful for your answers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! I just recently came across Trankit, even though it's been around for three years! I’m surprised that I haven’t seen this solution before, although I’ve worked quite a lot with classic NLP.
We are currently working on a corpus of a low-resource language (Faroese) and we have some hand-labeled data (about 1200 sentences, ~15000 tokens) in CONLL-U. XML-RoBERTa does not support Faroese, and therefore it is not listed as supported in your trainable pipeline, but there is another BERT-like model that does have Faroese data. I have several questions:
I will be very grateful for your answers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: