Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SUPPORT REQUEST] Add support for generic Github Actions implementation #317

Open
afinetooth opened this issue May 24, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@afinetooth
Copy link

Via support request, the feature request is to add support for a "Vanilla" implementation of Github Actions, fo users who for one reason or another cannot use the Coveralls Github Action.

The goal would be to add support for Github Actions CI that would not require the Coveralls Github Action, which means populating all JSON params for a user on node-coveralls that is using Github Actions alone. This entails mapping values from the environment like service_job_id.

To distinguish from the Coveralls Github Action, we could also add a usage note to use github for service_name, which would distinguish "vanilla" implementations from Coveralls Github Action ones.

@jtwebman
Copy link

jtwebman commented Mar 6, 2022

Since this library doesn't seem to be supported anymore I fix a bunch of things on a fork if you want to check it out and are still pulling the library into your packages: https://github.com/jtwebman/coveralls-next

I use this version in that library in a very generic way (https://github.com/jtwebman/coveralls-next/blob/master/.github/workflows/test.yml) but I used a different service name to do it as I couldn't figure out their logic for using the tool directly and using the GitHub token instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants