Should rlang::is_vector(x) be is.atomic(x)?

[Lextuga007]

It doesn't seem to be causing any issues but I encountered issues when I tried to use similar code in {NHSRpopulation} as the function was returning TRUE for a tibble as a vector.

http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Data-structures.html#:~:text=Use%20is.,object%20is%20actually%20a%20vector

[Lextuga007]

Probably better to be is.character https://adv-r.hadley.nz/vectors-chap.html#:~:text=Avoid%20is.vector()%2C%20is.atomic()%2C%20and%20is.numeric()%3A%20they%20don%E2%80%99t%20test%20if%20you%20have%20a%20vector%2C%20atomic%20vector%2C%20or%20numeric%20vector%3B%20you%E2%80%99ll%20need%20to%20carefully%20read%20the%20documentation%20to%20figure%20out%20what%20they%20actually%20do