New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Matching adversary between countermitm and claimchain #43

Open

azul opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 1 comment

Labels

Member

azul commented May 9, 2018

@carmelatroncoso in #40 :

Right now in ClaimChaim we speak about equivocation by users. If we want to stick to your story then this needs to be changed, and only added as a clarification at the end.
An alternative, is to actually consider non-honest users in the attacker model. Does this actually break any of the other defenses?

We need to think this through.

Collaborator

carmelatroncoso commented May 14, 2018

@azul, did my latest writeup of claimchains address this? I still feel that this needs clarification in the adversary model...

azul added the claimchain label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment